Calculate the electric field in the middle of half sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the center of a half-spherical shell with radius R. The user initially attempted to use spherical coordinates and integrate from 0 to π/2, but faced challenges with the formulation. Key insights include the necessity of using infinitesimal charge elements (dq) defined as (σ)(2πr sin(θ))(r dθ) and the importance of integrating due to the lack of symmetry that would allow the use of Gauss's law. The correct approach involves considering the electric field contributions from infinitesimal rings rather than shells.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of Gauss's law and its limitations
  • Concept of surface charge density (σ)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from charge distributions using integration
  • Learn about the application of Gauss's law in symmetric charge distributions
  • Explore the differences between solid and shell charge distributions
  • Investigate the use of cylindrical coordinates for electric field calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and electric field calculations, particularly in non-uniform charge distributions.

en.yokhai
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hey guys

i'm new here...i got here with a question...

i want to calculate the electric field in the middle of half sphere with raduse R ,
so..i made a rings out of the sphere,ds,which in fact is (2PI*R^2)sin(teta)d(teta), and tried to integrate from 0 to PI/2.

i did get something...i'd like to know if I'm right or not...

thanks:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd like to know what you got...
 
\sigma\2\epsilon

sigma dividd by 2 epsilon
 
en.yokhai said:
\sigma\2\epsilon

sigma dividd by 2 epsilon

well that's got to be wrong.. The electric field at any point is dependent on the radius vector... You equation has no r in it... And why go for spherical co ordinates if rectangular co ordinates make it more easier...

The analogy which you have shown here is perfect... But remember that you have to take shells and not rings... And then apply k(charge on the infinitesimal shell) divided by x square... where x is the radius of the shell
 
I get something else... (not \sigma/2\epsilon_0)

Try explaining how you did it.

Also, FedEx made me think of something: is this a solid half-sphere or a half-spherical shell? I'd assumed the latter because \sigma is usually surface charge density.
 
Are you talking about a spherical shell or a solid hemisphere?
 
i'm talking about a shell
 
You forgot to select the correct component. In what direction does the E-field point in the center?
 
well i finally come to the conclusion that spherical coordinates would remain simple... And taking rings would be much better

but the rings would be like

dq = (sigma)(2pi r sintheta)(r dtheta)

And now apply the formula of the electric field of a ring
 
  • #10
ahhh, yes. the infamous half sphere. you can't quite use gauss's law due to the lack of familiar symmetry, and it seems like you must integrate.

tell me about the source charge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K