MHB Calculate the length of the fourth side edge.

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghostfirefox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Edge Length
ghostfirefox
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
The three lateral edges of a pyramid based on a square are 6016, 2370 and 4350 long. Calculate the length of the fourth lateral edge. We assume that edges 6016 and 2370 extend from the opposite tops of the base.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ghostfirefox said:
The three lateral edges of a pyramid based on a square are 6016, 2370 and 4350 long. Calculate the length of the fourth lateral edge. We assume that edges 6016 and 2370 extend from the opposite tops of the base.

let the four corners of the square base with side length $s$ lie in the x y plane with positions

$(0,0,0)$, $(s,0,0)$, $(s,s,0)$, and $(0,s,0)$

let the apex of the pyramid be at position $(a,b,c)$

... assume that edges 6016 and 2370 extend from the opposite tops of the base

using the distance formula between two points in space yields the following equations

$a^2+b^2+c^2 = 6016^2$
$(a-s)^2+(b-s)^2+c^2 = 2370^2$
$(a-s)^2+b^2+c^2=4350^2$
$a^2+(b-s)^2+c^2 = d^2$, where $d$ is the length of the fourth edge

use the system of equations to solve for $d$ ... I get a unique integral value for $d$ such that $4350 < d < 6016$
 
I tried to calculate this, but there are too many variables in this system of equations.
 
Subtract the 3rd equation from the 1st.

Subtract the 2nd equation from the 4th.

Work the solution for $d$ from the resulting two equations.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top