Calculate the manometer reading

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bolter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manometer Reading
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a manometer reading related to fluid mechanics, specifically focusing on the effects of inclination on pressure measurements. The original poster is attempting to solve part b) of a problem after successfully addressing part a), which involved calculating pressures at different levels.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of inclining a manometer and question how this affects the mercury level and pressure readings. The original poster attempts to calculate a new manometer reading based on vertical height changes, while others suggest considering the geometry of the situation, including the relationship between the height and angle.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and suggestions for approaching the problem. There is an acknowledgment of the need to maintain balance in the system while exploring different interpretations of the problem setup. Some participants have offered guidance on using trigonometric relationships to find the correct height difference.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a specific answer (773 mm) that the original poster is trying to reconcile with their calculations. The discussion includes considerations of how the inclination of the manometer affects the readings and the necessity of maintaining certain conditions from part a).

Bolter
Messages
262
Reaction score
31
Homework Statement
See below
Relevant Equations
pressure = density * g * h
Having some trouble in answering part b) of this question

Screenshot 2020-09-29 at 23.38.43.png

Screenshot 2020-09-29 at 23.38.50.png

I managed to find the right answers for part a) if that is maybe needed in part b) which I got 26.7 kPa, 18.8 kPa, 38.6 kPa and 13.9 kPa for levels A, B, C and air pressure respectively

Not too sure what part b) is technically asking but I redrew the diagram and made the adjustment on the right side from what the question was asking

IMG_5298.JPG


Would the new manometer reading be '0.2 x sin15 = 0.0576m as we're only concerned with the vertical change in height that affects pressure?

Any help would be appreciated! Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The level of the surface of mercury does not change because the pipe gets inclined, but it requires more mass inside the tube.
The inclination of one tube an its scale is common practice to be able to see very small variations of level, that would be difficult to spot in a vertical tube.
If you were not adding some mercury into the bent tube, you would be altering the balance previously achieved in a).
 
Last edited:
Lnewqban said:
The level of the surface of mercury does not change because the pipe gets inclined, but it requires more mass inside the tube.
The inclination of one tube an its scale is common practice to be able to see very small variations of level, that would be difficult to spot in a vertical tube.
If you were not adding some mercury into the bent tube, you would be altering the balance previously achieved in a).

I see. For the new manometer reading that it asks for, I only need to find the height difference between level A and new level of the surface of mercury. That gives me h = 0.2 * sin15 = 0.05176m = 51.76mm

But this is wrong as the correct answer is in fact 773mm which it says from the sheet.
 
Perhaps if you consider 773 mm to be the hypotenuse of the triangle formed by height 200 mm and the angle?

Again, to keep balance of the system (same pressures and heights), the imaginary vertical column of mercury must remain being 200 mm.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bolter
Lnewqban said:
Perhaps if you consider 773 mm to be the hypotenuse of the triangle formed by height 200 mm and the angle?

Again, to keep balance of the system (same pressures and heights), the imaginary vertical column of mercury must remain being 200 mm.

Thanks I kept the imaginary vertical mercury column to remain as 200mm, and I managed to calculate 773mm in the end using basic trig. I got what the extra mercury mass needed to be too
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
You are welcome :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
28K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K