Calculate the tension in a rope attached to a ball in circular motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the tension in a rope attached to a ball undergoing circular motion. Participants are trying to understand the relationship between centripetal force, tension, and the radius of the circular path, as well as the implications of the ball's motion and the setup described in the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning how to determine the radius necessary for applying the centripetal force formula. There are discussions about the vertical distance from the point of suspension to the center of mass of the ball and whether this distance changes as the ball swings. Some participants are exploring the use of conservation of energy to find tangential velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various interpretations of the problem setup and questioning the assumptions made regarding the radius and the forces acting on the ball. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need to consider the radius of the arc of motion rather than just the vertical distance.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the diagram provided in the problem, particularly concerning the radius of the circular motion and how it relates to the length of the rope. The problem does not explicitly state whether the radius changes during the motion.

MattDutra123
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A solid iron ball of mass 770kg is used on a building site. The ball is suspended by a rope from a crane. The distance from the point of suspension to the centre of mass of the ball is 12m. The ball is pulled back from the vertical and then released. It falls through a vertical height of 1.6m and strikes a wall. Calculate the tension in the rope just before impact.
Relevant Equations
F (centripetal force) = mv^2/r
The solution to the problem simply states: "Use of mv^2/r = 2000. T = (2000 + 7500) = 9500N". I don't understand this solution. Nothing more is provided. I don't know how you are supposed to find the radius (in order to use the centripetal force formula) merely from the information provided. Also, why is the tension the sum of the centripetal force and weight (7500)?
Can someone please explain this to me?
The problem provides a sketch. I have included it in the attachments.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2019-05-28 at 20.38.22.png
    Screenshot 2019-05-28 at 20.38.22.png
    21.6 KB · Views: 813
Physics news on Phys.org
Using conservation of energy, what is the tangential velocity of the ball when it strikes the wall? Have you drawn a free body diagram of the ball just before it strikes the wall, showing the forces acting on the ball?
 
MattDutra123 said:
how you are supposed to find the radius
"The distance from the point of suspension to the centre of mass of the ball is 12m."
Will that distance change as the ball swings?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Chestermiller said:
Using conservation of energy, what is the tangential velocity of the ball when it strikes the wall? Have you drawn a free body diagram of the ball just before it strikes the wall, showing the forces acting on the ball?
I calculated it to be 5.6 m/s. Is this correct? Still, I don't know how to calculate the radius.
Apologies for the delay in answering.
 
haruspex said:
"The distance from the point of suspension to the centre of mass of the ball is 12m."
Will that distance change as the ball swings?
I don't know. The problem given doesn't mention it. Could we use this vertical distance as the radius (turning the triangle sideways)? Applying the formula with radius as 12 gives me the required answer of 2000 (2012.2666). Is this a correct way to approach the problem or is it a coincidence?
Apologies for the delay in answering.
 
MattDutra123 said:
Could we use this vertical distance
It is not, initially, a vertical distance. The diagram shows it in the final position.
Do you understand that what you need is the radius of the arc through which the ball swings, not the radius of the ball? (You are expected to treat that as a point mass.)
 
haruspex said:
It is not, initially, a vertical distance. The diagram shows it in the final position.
Do you understand that what you need is the radius of the arc through which the ball swings, not the radius of the ball? (You are expected to treat that as a point mass.)
Yes, I understand this, but from the diagram what I see is that the vertical length of the rope holding the ball is 12m. It swings horizontally to hit the wall through an unknown distance. That is my interpretation of the diagram. I cannot see how the ball is swinging through a 12 meter arc.
 
MattDutra123 said:
Yes, I understand this, but from the diagram what I see is that the vertical length of the rope holding the ball is 12m. It swings horizontally (?) to hit the wall through an unknown distance. That is my interpretation of the diagram. I cannot see how the ball is swinging through a 12 meter arc.

The ball is not moving horizontally. The ball is moving in a circular arc of radius 12m.

Perhaps your first problem is that the question setter expects you to see this as obvious. But, if you don't see it, then it's hard to explain.
 
In the final vertical position of the ball, the radius is 12 m, which is the same as the length of the rope. If the rope is inextensible, its length in the initial (non-vertical) position of the ball is also 12 m. If the length of the rope doesn't change, what is the radius in the initial position of the ball?
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
916
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K