Calculate Total Impedance Quickly in Series Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter weedannycool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating total impedance in series circuits, specifically addressing the challenges of using the formula 1/Zt = 1/Z1 + 1/Z2 for multiple impedances. The user explores alternative methods, such as simplifying circuits with capacitors in parallel and using the equation ZT = (Z1.Z2)/(Z1 + Z2) for branches. The importance of handling complex numbers is emphasized, particularly when dealing with arithmetic errors in calculations. The user concludes that careful layout and explanation of calculations can mitigate mistakes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers in electrical engineering
  • Familiarity with impedance calculations in AC circuits
  • Knowledge of series and parallel circuit configurations
  • Proficiency in using formulas for total impedance, such as ZT = (Z1.Z2)/(Z1 + Z2)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to simplify complex impedances in series and parallel circuits
  • Study the application of complex conjugates in impedance calculations
  • Explore the use of phasors in AC circuit analysis
  • Investigate common mistakes in arithmetic when working with complex numbers
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing AC circuits and impedance calculations.

weedannycool
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
to find the the total impedance of a circuit i use 1/Zt=1/Z+1/Z...ect. this way is quite lenghty when dealing with more than two impedances.

i wonder if there is a qicker way of doing it maybe by just using the magnitude of the capacitor to get rid of the imaginary part.

for example if i had a risistor , a capacitor. and a inductor in series with a risistor.

what i did was find the impedances of each branch then used the eq ZT=(Z1.Z2)/Z1+Z2 to find the impedance of the first to branch then simpify the circuit replacing the two branches with a single impedance and used the eq again.

but it doesn't seem to agree with my lecture's answer.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It is messier than series circuits.

I assume some voltage and then work out the currents for the branches of the parallel network.

Then you can just add the currents to get a total current and then get back to an impedance by dividing the voltage by this current.

I suppose it amounts to the same process. Because it involves smaller steps, you can track down atithmetic errors easier, I guess.

If you have capacirors in parallel, you can certainly simplify those (by just adding the capacitances) , but not if they have series resistors or other extra components.
 
What it i was just given a current source and no voltage was given. i guess i would have to do it the other way. i tend to mess up the arithmetic since i havn't covered complex numbers yet. If u have a complex number on the bottom of the first equation then i am not sure what to do to get rid of it.
 
It is very easy to get the arithmetic wrong with these, so it is important to lay the solution out well so you can check it through afterwards. Explain what you are doing and leave blank lines between calculations.

If you haven't done complex numbers, you will find these calculations pretty weird.

You may be able to follow this example:

complex no calc.PNG


It starts off with a complex number 12 - j40 in the bottom line. See what happens when you multiply by 12 + j40 / 12 + J40. The J's vanish and you get something you can deal with.
 
Thank you. This should help me.
 
Most likely this can only be answered by an "old timer". I am making measurements on an uA709 op amp (metal can). I would like to calculate the frequency rolloff curves (I can measure them). I assume the compensation is via the miller effect. To do the calculations I would need to know the gain of the transistors and the effective resistance seen at the compensation terminals, not including the values I put there. Anyone know those values?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K