Calculating Norton Equivalent Circuit for Complex Load Impedance

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the Norton Equivalent Circuit for a complex load impedance of 50Ω (0.7 power factor lagging), represented as 35.002 + J35.705Ω. The voltage sources V1 and V2 are converted to RMS values and subsequently transformed into current sources, yielding I1 = -J103.75A and I2 = -69.16666667A. The total short-circuit current Isc is calculated as -69.16666667 - J103.75A, leading to the Norton equivalent impedance Zn of J2.4Ω. The final load voltage VL is determined to be 235.2851896 - J168.1426532, and the load current IL is calculated as 0.8927 - J5.714A, confirming the accuracy of the method used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex impedance and phasor representation
  • Knowledge of Norton and Thevenin equivalent circuits
  • Proficiency in Ohm's Law and its application to AC circuits
  • Familiarity with converting voltage sources to current sources
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Norton and Thevenin equivalents in AC circuits
  • Learn about complex power calculations in AC systems
  • Explore the use of phasors in circuit analysis
  • Investigate the impact of power factor on load impedance
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying circuit analysis, and professionals involved in power systems who need to understand Norton equivalent circuits for complex loads.

Joe85
Messages
29
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Hi all,

I realise that this question has been asked numerous times in relation to Parts A and B but am strugging to find any ground covered on Part C. I believe i have answered this correctly but the wording of the question leads me to believe perhaps i have missinterpreted what was being asked.

The Question:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/upload_2014-10-10_17-15-52-png-png.237468/

FIGURE 1 shows a 50 Ω load being fed from two voltage sources via
their associated reactances. Determine the current i flowing in the load by:

(a) applying Thévenin’s theorem
(b) applying the superposition theorem
(c) by transforming the two voltage sources and their associated
reactances into current sources (and thus form a pair of Norton
generators)

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/upload_2014-10-10_17-15-52-png-png.237468/
Relevant Equations
.
upload_2014-10-10_17-15-52-png-png.png


V1 = 415cos(100πt)
V2 = 415sin(100πt)
Load Impedance = 50Ω (0.7 Pf Lag) = 35.002 + J35.705Ω
Converting V1 & V2 to RMS values and V1 to a sin value:
V1 = 415cos(100πt)
V2 = 415cos(100πt-90)
and from Asin(ωt+Φ)
V1 = 415∠0V or 415 +J0V
V2 = 415∠-90V or 0-j415 VIntially, i convert the the volage sources into current sources:

I1 = V1/J4 = -J103.75A
I2 = V2/J6 = -69.16666667A

I then red-draw the circuit with the voltage sources replaced with current sources and the series impedances placed in parallel with the current source.

Next step was to remove the load impedance and replace with a short circuit. I then took the current through the Short Circuit (Points A & B):

Isc = I1+I2 = -69.16666667 - J103.75A.Next step was to replace the the current sources with Open Circuits and remove the short circuit that was placed beween Points A & B.

With the Two Reactances in parallel:

Zn = (Z1Z2)/(Z1+Z2)
Zn = J2.4ΩCircuit is now redrawn as a Norton Equvalent with Isc in parallel with Zn and an open circuit between Points A & B.

Once again, redrew the circuit again placing the Load (ZL) back into the circuit between points A & B.

Zn & Zl now in parallel - Product over sum rule to reduce to a total impedance Zt:

Zt = (ZnZL)/(Zn+ZL) = 0.07530879804 + J2.318014921Ω

Calculated the Load Voltage using Ohms Law:

VL = Isc × Zt = 235.2851896 - J168.1426532.Finally, i calculated the load current utilising Ohms Law on Load impedance:

IL = VL/ZL = 0.8927 -J5.714A.The answer is identical to my answer for parts A & B (to 4 sf - may revist the calculations to tidy up), just not sure the method I've used is what they were asking.

Thanks,

Joe.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks like how I'd do it, if asked to make a Norton equivalent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Joe85
Thank you for the response, Scott.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K