MHB Calculate Volume of Solid of Revolution for y=sinx to y=cosx around y=2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of the solid formed by rotating the area between the curves y=sin(x) and y=cos(x) from x=π/2 to x=π around the line y=2. The washer method is identified as the appropriate technique, with the outer radius defined as R=2-cos(x) and the inner radius as r=2-sin(x). The volume differential is expressed as dV=π(R^2-r^2)dx, leading to the integration of the function to find the total volume. The final calculation yields a volume of 8π cubic units. This method effectively illustrates the application of calculus in determining volumes of solids of revolution.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Volume obtained by rotating the region between y=sinx and y=cosx from x=pi/2 to x=pi around the line y=2?


Find the Volume obtained by rotating the region between y=sinx and y=cosx from x=pi/2 to x=pi around the line y=2.

I'm so confused about the y= 2 part, and help would be greatly appreciated!

Hint: Cos(x)^2-sin(x)^2=cos(2x)

I have posted a link there to this thread to the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Brittney Mitchell's question at Yahoo! Answers: computing the volume of a sold of revolution

Hello Brittney Mitchell,

For problems of this nature, it is always a good idea to diagram the region to be revolved along with the axis of rotation so we can see what is involved. Please refer to the following sketch:

View attachment 1891

We can see that the washer method will work best for us here since both radii are defined as one function over the given domain. So, let's begin by stated the volume of an arbitrary washer:

$$dV=\pi\left(R^2-r^2 \right)\,dx$$

Now, the outer radius $R$ is the distance from the axis of rotation to the bottom curve which is $\cos(x)$, hence:

$$R=2-\cos(x)$$

And, the inner radius $r$ is the distance from the axis of rotation to the top curve which is $\sin(x)$, hence:

$$r=2-\sin(x)$$

And so we may write:

$$R^2-r^2=\left(2-\cos(x) \right)^2-\left(2-\sin(x) \right)^2$$

Using the difference of squares formula, we may state:

$$R^2-r^2=\left(4-\left(\sin(x)+\cos(x) \right) \right)\left(\sin(x)-\cos(x) \right)$$

Distributing, we obtain:

$$R^2-r^2=4\left(\sin(x)-\cos(x) \right)+\left(\cos^2(x)-\sin^2(x) \right)$$

And using a double-angle identity for cosine (the provided hint), we obtain:

$$R^2-r^2=4\left(\sin(x)-\cos(x) \right)+\cos(2x)$$

Thus, the volume of the arbitrary washer may be given as:

$$dV=\pi\left(4\left(\sin(x)-\cos(x) \right)+\cos(2x) \right)\,dx$$

And, summing up all the washers to get the volume of the described solid of revolution, we obtain:

$$V=\int_{\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\pi} 4\left(\sin(x)-\cos(x) \right)+\cos(2x)\,dx$$

Applying the FTOC, we get:

$$V=\pi\left[-4\left(\cos(x)+\sin(x) \right)-\frac{1}{2}\sin(2x) \right]_{\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\pi}$$

$$V=-\pi\left(\left(4((-1)+0)+0 \right)-\left(4(0+1)+0 \right) \right)=-\pi(-8)=8\pi$$

Thus, we find the volume of the solid in units cubed is $8\pi$.
 

Attachments

  • brittneym.jpg
    brittneym.jpg
    9.5 KB · Views: 113
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top