MHB Calculating 5-Star Ratings to Reach 4.85 Rating

  • Thread starter Thread starter loso6699
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rating
AI Thread Summary
To increase a current rating of 4.80 to 4.85, approximately 59 additional 5-star ratings are needed, based on a total of 1115 ratings. The calculation considers the average rating formula, where the sum of actual votes is divided by the total number of votes. If the number of actual votes is less than 1115, the required number of additional 5-star ratings may vary. For a more significant increase, such as to 4.90, a similar calculation can be applied with adjusted parameters. Understanding these calculations can help in strategizing for improved ratings.
loso6699
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello guys I was going to ask a question regarding 5 star ratings its a hard one for me but it could be simple for you guys here it is,

I've got 1115 ratings ( 5 star max 1 lowest )

* What I know so far is my total rating is 4.80
* 696 of these are 5 star ratings
* some of the 1115 have not rated not sure how many but not too many 100-150 max i'd say

Questions, how many 5* ratings would I need to get rating up by 0.01 my aim is 4.85 rating or 4.9 to make it easier I just want a estimate to figure out where i'am

thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
loso6699 said:
Hello guys I was going to ask a question regarding 5 star ratings its a hard one for me but it could be simple for you guys here it is,

I've got 1115 ratings ( 5 star max 1 lowest )

* What I know so far is my total rating is 4.80
* 696 of these are 5 star ratings
* some of the 1115 have not rated not sure how many but not too many 100-150 max i'd say

Questions, how many 5* ratings would I need to get rating up by 0.01 my aim is 4.85 rating or 4.9 to make it easier I just want a estimate to figure out where i'am

thanks

Hi loso6699! Welcome to MHB! ;)

Suppose we have $N$ actual votes $x_i$ where $i=1..N$.
So $N \le 1115$.
Then the rating is:
$$\text{rating} = x_{average} = \frac {\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^N x_i}N = 4.80$$
It follows that the sum of all actual votes is:
$$\sum_{i=1}^N x_i = 4.80 N$$

Now suppose we add $n$ extra votes of $5$ stars.
Then the new rating will be:
$$\frac {\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^N x_i + 5n}{N+n} = \frac {4.80 N + 5n}{N+n} = 4.81 \quad\Rightarrow\quad
4.80 N + 5n = 4.81(N+n) \quad\Rightarrow\quad
(5 - 4.81)n = (4.81-4.80)N $$
So:
$$n = \frac{0.01 N}{5-4.81} \le \frac{0.01 \cdot 1115}{5-4.81} = 58.7
$$
That means that with 59 extra votes of 5 stars, the rating is guaranteed to go up by 0.01.

If the actual votes was, say, 100 less, then we can do the same calculation with $1015$ instead of $1115$.
And if we want to go up by $0.05$, we can replace $0.01$ and $4.81$ by $0.05$ respectively $4.85$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top