Stargazing Calculating a Telescope's Limiting Magnitude

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ishtar_UK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnitude
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating a telescope's limiting magnitude by incorporating factors such as magnification, transmission coefficient, and observer's pupil size. The standard formula for limiting magnitude (LM) is LM = 2.5 * LOG10( (Aperture / Pupil_Size)² ) + NELM, but this does not account for the darkening effects of magnification. A more accurate formula proposed is LM = -22.81 + 1.792 * Darkening_Factor - 0.02949 * Darkening_Factor² + 2.5 * LOG10( Aperture² ) * transmission_coefficient, although it currently omits the observer's pupil size. The discussion highlights the need for further refinement to include all relevant factors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of telescope optics and limiting magnitude
  • Familiarity with logarithmic calculations
  • Knowledge of transmission coefficients in optics
  • Basic grasp of observer's pupil size effects on astronomy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of pupil size on limiting magnitude calculations
  • Explore advanced telescope optics and their impact on light transmission
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of limiting magnitude formulas
  • Investigate online calculators and their algorithms for astronomical calculations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, amateur astronomers, and anyone involved in telescope design or optimization will benefit from this discussion. It is particularly relevant for those looking to understand and calculate limiting magnitude accurately.

Ishtar_UK
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone

I'm new to this community so I hope that I have posted this question to the correct forum. If not, please advise on the best forum for my question.

Recently, I have been trying to find a reliable formula to calculate a specific telescope's limiting magnitude while factoring magnification, the telescopes transmission coefficient and the observers dilated pupil size. It's clear that higher magnifications darken the sky and so increase contrast (which has the effect of increasing the limiting magnitude). Also, the observers pupil size has a substantial effect too and thus must be taken into account.

The standard limiting magnitude calculation can be expressed as:

LM = 2.5 * LOG10( (Aperture / Pupil_Size)2 ) + NELM

But obviously this does not take into account the darkening effects of magnification. After reading the Wikipedia page on Limiting Magnitude I came up with the following equation.

LM = (NELM - 2) + 2.5 LOG10( ((Aperture / Pupil_Size)2) * power)

However, the equation above is exaggerating answer. In fact, it is about two magnitudes too high. I am also not sure why the Wikipedia article was suggested subtracting 2 from the NELM, but without it, the answer is even further out.

I did some further digging around and managed to come up with the following equation which does give a reliable limiting magnitude while factoring the telescopes transmission but does not include the observers pupil size.

Stage One

Darkening_Factor =
28.57 - 2.814 * NELM + 0.369 * NELM2 + 5 * LOG10( power / (aperture * √ transmission_coefficient) )

Stage Two

LM =
-22.81 + 1.792 * Darkening_Factor - 0.02949 * Darkening_Factor2 + 2.5 * LOG10( Aperture2 ) * transmission_coefficient)

As stated above, this seems to work well but does not include the observers pupil size. I have played around with the equation by doing the following but sadly this does not seem to work. Also, I am not sure what all those constants mean in stage one and two.

Stage Two - Modified: Does NOT Work

LM =
-22.81 + 1.792 * Darkening_Factor - 0.02949 * Darkening_Factor2 + 2.5 * LOG10( (Aperture / pupil_size)2) * transmission_coefficient)

I would be grateful if somebody could point me in the right direction. I believe I am nearly there, that is, aside from reliably including the observers pupil size.

Any help would be gratefully received.

Amanda
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thank you Chronos

I am aware of the online calculator, I've been using it to test my calculations. However, for various reasons, want to make these calculations myself. I will take a look at the Limiting Magnitude article; it looks just what I am looking for.

Many Thanks
Amanda
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoM-z14 Any photon with energy above 24.6 eV is going to ionize any atom. K, L X-rays would certainly ionize atoms. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-the-most-distant-galaxy/ The James Webb Space Telescope has found the most distant galaxy ever seen, at the dawn of the cosmos. Again. https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/webb-mom-z14 A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 226 ·
8
Replies
226
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K