Calculating Acceleration Due to Gravity Using Velocity, Time, and Position Data

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration due to gravity using collected data on velocity, time, and position from a lab experiment involving a logger lite and go motion probe. Participants express uncertainty about how to derive this acceleration, particularly since they have not covered the topic in class.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest graphing velocity versus time to find the slope, which represents acceleration. There are discussions about the implications of initial velocity and the nature of the motion (e.g., whether it is free fall or involves other forces). Some participants question how to interpret their data and the meaning of specific equations related to motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing insights and clarifying concepts. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of equations and the interpretation of graphs, but there is no explicit consensus on the method to calculate the acceleration due to gravity. Multiple interpretations of the data and its implications are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as a lack of prior instruction on the topic and confusion regarding the application of equations. There is also mention of experimental data that may need to be shared for further clarification.

ejohnston
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was given a lab using the logger lite and go motion probe. After collecting my data, which is only velocity, time and position, i was asked to calculate the acceleration due to gravity. We have never gone over this and the only information i have is to due with what i said before.
We do know that acceleration is -9.81 though

Homework Equations


Is there anyway to find out the acceleration due to gravity for this ! I don't understand how i am suppose to find this out !


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
If acceleration is constant, then v = at. Try graphing the velocity versus time and looking for the slope.
 
ejohnston said:

Homework Statement


I was given a lab using the logger lite and go motion probe. After collecting my data, which is only velocity, time and position, i was asked to calculate the acceleration due to gravity. We have never gone over this and the only information i have is to due with what i said before.
We do know that acceleration is -9.81 though

Homework Equations


Is there anyway to find out the acceleration due to gravity for this ! I don't understand how i am suppose to find this out !


The Attempt at a Solution


For a lab, remember that you don't "know" gravity is [itex]-9.81 \frac{m}{s^2}[/itex] since that is what you are told to find.

In the most basic sense, what is acceleration? Try listing a few different ways to describe acceleration (i.e. different equations).

After making the list (make sure you show units in your descriptions), can you use anything from your data to construct this?
 
daveb ! thank you for replying so fast ! but my v-t graph has multiple places to find the sole. it starts at 0, accelerates up, then de-celerates ! where do i find my slope?
 
Ignea_unda said:
For a lab, remember that you don't "know" gravity is [itex]-9.81 \frac{m}{s^2}[/itex] since that is what you are told to find.

In the most basic sense, what is acceleration? Try listing a few different ways to describe acceleration (i.e. different equations).

After making the list (make sure you show units in your descriptions), can you use anything from your data to construct this?

that is what i ended up doing, yet i found an exceleration of -1.04m/s2 ! urg that means the percent error is 89! does that even make sens if the ball i threw in the air was a volly ball ?
 
daveb; v(t)=at+v0. The constant is actually important, if this isn't a simple freefall-experiment that is.

integrating this equation with time yields, s(t) = 0,5at^2 + v0*t.
if you know the initial velocity, the time the journey took and how long it travelled, can't you solve for a?
 
ejohnston said:
daveb ! thank you for replying so fast ! but my v-t graph has multiple places to find the sole. it starts at 0, accelerates up, then de-celerates ! where do i find my slope?

Think about where the ball was at each point in time. After it leaves your hands, what forces are acting on it? I don't think that after it left your hand it was accelerating up, but rather just had a positive velocity at that time.
 
Cipherflak said:
daveb; v(t)=at+v0. The constant is actually important, unless you do a simple freefall-experiment

integrating this equation with time yields, s(t) = 0,5at^2 + v0*t.
if you know the initial velocity, the time the journey took and how long it travelled, can't you solve for a?

this is what i have been looking for! but my teacher hasn't explained what s(t) = 0,5at^2 + v0*t means -_- would you mind explaining this to me?
 
it as an equation that describes how long your object travels, s, when you plug in acceleration and time. and initial velocity, v0. :)

Or did you ask how I got there?
 
  • #10
Cipherflak said:
it as an equation that describes how long your object travels, s, when you plug in acceleration and time. and initial velocity, v0. :)

Or did you ask how I got there?

Thank you :) but now when rearanging my eqation, i have 2 t, do i replace both with the same number ?!
 
  • #11
first of all, what is your initial velocity? if you simply "dropped" the ball, it is 0 and you lose a term.
 
  • #12
Cipherflak said:
first of all, what is your initial velocity? if you simply "dropped" the ball, it is 0 and you lose a term.

no, the ball was thrown then catched, but i see what you're saying , so my v1 is 0, v2 0.157 m and time is 1.8s so the acceleration is 1.045 m/s^2 ? ahh so confusing!
 
  • #13
no matter. you get one term of t^2 and one term of t, but this pose no problem. As far as I've understood you are solving for a, and the value of t is known?

if it doesn't work, give me all your experimental data and explain what you did in the lab.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
918
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
940
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K