Calculating acceleration offset by CG

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The Don
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration readings of an accelerometer not positioned at the Center of Gravity (CG) of an object. The user seeks to understand how to derive the accelerometer's output at the CG based on its readings at a specific location (Xa, Za). A reference solution is provided, but the user expresses confusion regarding the transformation matrix and the role of q_dot and alpha in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of accelerometer readings and their interpretation
  • Familiarity with transformation matrices in physics
  • Knowledge of rotational dynamics and angular displacement
  • Basic principles of vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of transformation matrices in inertial measurement units
  • Explore the role of angular velocity (q_dot) in acceleration calculations
  • Investigate how to apply vector calculus to real-world motion scenarios
  • Learn about the effects of non-CG placement on sensor readings in dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and students involved in robotics, aerospace, or any field requiring precise motion analysis and sensor placement optimization.

The Don
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to calculate the acceleration an accelerometer would read NOT placed in the Center of Gravity of the object. Let's look at the figure below. The accelerometer was placed in location (Xa,Za) and not in the CG of the object. Given that the accel's output is a_x and a_z at this location (Xa,Za)...what would've the accelerometers have read if placed on the C.G. of object?

upload_2015-12-7_17-31-32-png.93064.png


Here is an attempt at the solution (http://basicairdata.blogspot.com/2014/05/inertial-measurement-unit-placement.html) however I don't fully understand how they got the transformation matrix.

How does q_dot come into play in the calculations and how does alpha (angle) disappear in the matrix?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K