Calculating Added Mass: What is the Correct Approach?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Mistake
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the added mass of a sphere accelerating in a fluid, specifically addressing discrepancies in integration techniques. The user initially attempted to derive the surface normal element using the equation ##\vec{dS} = R^2 \sin \theta \, d\theta \, d\phi \hat{r}## but encountered issues with the integration limits and the resulting terms. Key corrections included recognizing that the surface element in the direction of motion should be ##R^2 \sin\theta \cos \theta \, d\theta \, d\phi## and that the integration should only cover the leading hemisphere, specifically integrating ##\phi \in [0,\pi/2]## instead of ##[0,\pi]##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics and added mass concepts
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and surface integrals
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and their application in physics
  • Experience with integration techniques in multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of added mass for different geometries, such as cylinders and plates
  • Learn about the application of spherical coordinates in fluid dynamics problems
  • Explore advanced integration techniques, particularly in multivariable calculus
  • Investigate the effects of fluid properties on added mass calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid dynamics, mechanical engineers, and physicists involved in calculating forces on objects moving through fluids.

member 428835
Hi PF!
I'm calculating the added mass of a sphere accelerating in a fluid, which I found here: http://web.mit.edu/2.016/www/handouts/Added_Mass_Derivation_050916.pdf
My thought process was slightly different from theirs, but I am not getting the same answer. My thoughts are to take the surface normal element of a sphere, in this case ##\vec{dS} = R^2 \sin \theta \, d\theta \, d\phi \hat{r}## and dot this with the direction of the sphere, say in the direction of the zenith angle, ##\hat{y}##. We know ##\hat{r} = \sin \theta \sin \phi \hat{x} + \sin \theta \sin \phi \hat{y} + r \cos \theta \hat{z}##, which implies ##\hat{r} \cdot \hat{y} = \sin \phi \sin \theta##, which means my surface element in the direction of motion would be ##R^2 \sin^2 \theta \sin \phi d\theta d\phi##. now if we integrate ##\phi## from ##[0,2\pi]## the ##\sin \phi## term takes this to zero. Even if it did give me ##2 \pi## like in the link, I still have an extra sine and lack a cosine.

Any ideas on how to amend my approach, and also why it's not working?

Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have clear in my head what your diagram looks like relating the direction of motion to the coordinates. An obvious switch is to take it to be in the z direction instead. Is suspect you have effectively only considered part of the contributions so the element in direction of motion (e.g., shoild be an x term too).
Wrt integration range, you only want the leading hemisphere, so the positive range of the trig functions.
 
haruspex said:
An obvious switch is to take it to be in the z direction instead. Is suspect you have effectively only considered part of the contributions so the element in direction of motion (e.g., shoild be an x term too).
Oops, right, so what I should have had was ##\hat{r} \cdot \hat{z} = \cos \theta##. This implies the surface element toward the direction of motion is ##R^2 \sin\theta \cos \theta \, d\theta \,d \phi##.
haruspex said:
Wrt integration range, you only want the leading hemisphere, so the positive range of the trig functions.
So the force from added mass is then $$\int_0^{2 \pi} \int_0^{\pi/2} p R^2 \sin\theta \cos \theta \, d\theta \,d \phi$$ But integrate the leading hemisphere implies integrating ##\phi \in [0,\pi/2]## yet they integrate from ##[0,\pi]##. Can you explain the difference here? It also looks like they integrate the cylinder from ##[0,2\pi]## rather than ##[-\pi/2,\pi/2]##.

Thanks a ton for your reply!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
433
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K