Calculating Angular Momentum when Radius Changes for 2s

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Radius
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the angular momentum of a 2.0-kg block that accelerates in a two-dimensional plane. The block starts from rest at a distance of 3.0 m from the origin and experiences an acceleration of (4.0 m/s²)î + (3.0 m/s²)ĵ. After 2.0 seconds, the correct angular momentum about the origin is determined to be (36 kg·m²/s)k̂. The calculation involves using the formula L = |r x p|, where the tangential velocity is calculated as 6 m/s.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum and its calculation
  • Familiarity with vector operations, specifically cross products
  • Knowledge of kinematics, including acceleration and velocity
  • Basic principles of physics related to motion in two dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum in two-dimensional motion
  • Learn about the effects of changing radius on angular momentum
  • Explore vector calculus, particularly cross product applications in physics
  • Review kinematic equations for uniformly accelerated motion
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding angular momentum calculations in dynamic systems.

MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
26. A 2.0-kg block starts from rest on the positive x-axis 3.0 m from the origin and thereafter has an acceleration given by a = (4.0 m/s2)ˆi (3.0 m/s2)ˆj. At the end of 2.0 s its angular momentum about the origin is:
A. 0
B. (36kg·m2/s)kˆ
C. (+48kg·m2/s)kˆ
D. (96kg·m2/s)kˆ
E. (+96kg·m2/s)kˆ
ans: B

For this question, they essentially did:

L = | r x p |
L = (r)(m)(v)
L = (3m)(2kg)(6m/s) * I calculated v = 6 m/s to be the tangential velocity

Now, I was wondering why they didn't change the radius since it accelerates for 2 seconds. During this time period, it moves across the axis, parallel to the original rotation axis.

Δx = (1/2)(4m/s2)(2s)2 and I added this length to my attempt, but it doesn't seem like the solution did. I was wondering if this is correct or if it's incorrect for future reference...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want comments on the book(?) solution, please post the complete text of that.
But I would have thought the appropriate method here would be a purely vectorial one, which turns out to be very easy.
##\vec {\ddot x} = \vec c##
##\vec { \dot x} = \vec c t + \vec {\dot {x_0}} = \vec c t##
##\vec x = \frac 12 \vec c t^2 + \vec x_0##
##\vec L = m \vec x × \dot {\vec x} = m (\frac 12 \vec c t^2 + \vec x_0)× \vec c t = m \vec x_0 × \vec c t##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
17K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K