Calculating Angular Velocity and Linear Acceleration in a Speed Skater's Curve

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a speed skater increasing speed while navigating a curve, specifically focusing on calculating angular velocity and average linear acceleration. The context includes concepts from kinematics and rotational motion, particularly relating linear and angular quantities.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between linear velocity and angular velocity, questioning how to derive angular velocity without a given angle. Some suggest using the known radius and final linear velocity to find angular velocity.
  • There is a debate on how to calculate average linear acceleration, with some proposing a straightforward approach while others highlight the complexity due to the need for considering both tangential and centripetal accelerations.
  • Concerns are raised about the ambiguity of the term "linear acceleration" in the context of the problem, with participants questioning whether it refers specifically to tangential acceleration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and the terminology used. Some guidance has been provided regarding the calculations, but there is no explicit consensus on the definitions or the approach to take for the average linear acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential ambiguity in the problem statement, particularly regarding the definitions of linear and tangential acceleration. There is also mention of assumptions that may need to be made about the nature of the skater's acceleration throughout the curve.

Katie Morton
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A speed skater increases his speed from 10 m/s to 12.5 m/s over a period of 3 seconds while coming out of a curve of 20 m radius.
a. What is the magnitude of his angular velocity as he leaves the curve? Be sure to include proper units for your answer.
b. What is his average linear acceleration during this curve?

Homework Equations


ω=Δθ/Δt
vt=rω

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure how to start this problem because there is not a given angle. I am wondering if there is a different way to solve for angular velocity or if there is a way to calculate the angle based on the given information.

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the equation relating linear velocity to angular velocity?
We know the radius and we know the linear velocity at the instant the skater leaves the curve, so we can use that formula to calculate the angular velocity at that instant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Katie Morton
andrewkirk said:
What is the equation relating linear velocity to angular velocity?
We know the radius and we know the linear velocity at the instant the skater leaves the curve, so we can use that formula to calculate the angular velocity at that instant.

tangential velocity: vt = rω
so you could rearrange to ω = vt/r
ω = 12/20
ω = 0.6 rad/sec

would that be correct?

And for the second part is it just a simple a=Δv/Δt question because it is asking for linear acceleration?
 
Katie Morton said:
would that be correct?
The method is right, but you appear to have used 12m/s instead of 12.5m/s for the linear velocity.

I find the second question ambiguous. To calculate the skater's tangential linear acceleration you can do what you suggest, and my best guess is that that's what they're after. But the actual linear acceleration of the skater at any point in time while in the curve is the vector sum of her tangential and radial accelerations, where the latter is the centripetal acceleration required to maintain the curve. So the true linear acceleration is the average of that vector sum, which is more complex and also depends on info that we don't have, which is the pattern of acceleration while in the curve (eg constant accel, vs accelerate hard then ease off, vs build up then shut off suddenly).

I suggest you do it the way you indicated, but reply that that is the average linear tangential acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Katie Morton
andrewkirk said:
reply that that is the average linear tangential acceleration.
Not sure that resolves the difficulty.

[Edit: next lines are incorrect. See post #8.
The average tangential acceleration should be (final tangential velocity - initial tangential velocity)/time.
But the velocity is tangential throughout, so this is the same as the average acceleration. ]

As you say, to find that we need to assume e.g. that the rate of change of speed is constant.
I think what you mean is the average rate of change of speed.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps we're at cross purposes. What I meant was this:
I get an average tangential acceleration of (12.5-10)/3 which is about 0.8 m/s^2.
The centripetal acceleration will be 10^2 / 20= 5m/s^2 at the beginning of the curve and about 7.8m/s^2 at the end. If we assume the magnitude of tangential acceleration was constant throughout the curve, the magnitude of total acceleration just before the end is ##\sqrt{7.8^2+0.8^2}=7.9ms^{-2}## and just after the beginning it is ##\sqrt{5^2+0.8^2}=5.1ms^{-2}##. The tangential acceleration is dominated by the much larger centripetal acceleration.

The average acceleration is going to be somewhere between 5.1 and 7.9##ms^{-2}##, depending on the pattern of the tangential acceleration over the three seconds.

Unless 'linear acceleration' is used in this course with a specific meaning that somehow excludes centripetal acceleration, eg if it means 'magnitude of tangential acceleration expressed as a linear acceleration'. I'm not familiar with such a convention though.
 
andrewkirk said:
I get an average tangential acceleration of (12.5-10)/3
I am saying that is wrong. That's the average magnitude of tangential acceleration.
The average tangential acceleration would be ##\frac{\int \vec a_T.dt}{\Delta t}##, where ##\vec a_T## is the instantaneous tangential acceleration. We can write ##\vec a_T = \vec r \times \vec\alpha##. If ##\vec\alpha## is constant, we have ##\frac{\int \vec r.dt\times \vec \alpha}{\Delta t}##, but ##\int \vec r.dt## still looks messy.
 
haruspex said:
I am saying that is wrong. That's the average magnitude of tangential acceleration
Fair point. So I'm guessing that what the question is after is the average magnitude of tangential acceleration. Calculating anything else would be too complex for the level of question this appears to be.

Do you think there's any terminology convention under which average linear acceleration means that?

I'm thinking that (b) is a badly worded question.
 
andrewkirk said:
So I'm guessing that what the question is after is the average magnitude of tangential acceleration. Calculating anything else would be too complex for the level of question this appears to be.
Agreed.
andrewkirk said:
Do you think there's any terminology convention under which average linear acceleration means that?
Not that I'm aware of, but that does not mean much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K