Calculating Area of a Tesla Turbine | Power Output Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the performance and power output calculation of Tesla turbines, referencing a specific paper that presents a formula on page 23. There is uncertainty about whether to calculate the area based on one side of a single disc or both sides of all discs, as Tesla turbines differ significantly from conventional turbines. Participants express skepticism about the applicability of the provided equation to Tesla turbines, noting that these turbines operate on boundary layer drag rather than impulse or reaction forces. Additionally, the Tesla turbine's inefficiency compared to other turbine designs is highlighted, with a consensus that it lacks a justified application. Overall, the Tesla turbine's reputation is viewed as inflated due to its association with Nikola Tesla.
T C
Messages
353
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
The power that can be generated by a Tesla turbine can be deduced by using a formula that has been given in a equation in given document. Want to know how the area (mentioned in the formula) can be determined for Tesla turbine.
Found this paper regarding performance of Tesla turbine. At the page 23, a formula regarding possible power output from a Tesla turbine is given. But, I want to know how to deduce the area given the formula. Tesla turbines are discs placed one after another with specific gaps in between the discs. I want to know, whether it's just the area of only one side of a single disc or both front and back part of all the discs that will come into contact with the flow.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Page 12 of the paper, is on page 23 of the pdf file.
The equation is at the bottom of that page.
I believe that is a general equation, where area refers to the flow section of the turbine, not applicable directly to a Tesla turbine.
 
You want to mean that this equation can hardly describe the output for Tesla turbine, right? Me too have some doubt about that part. In case of common market available turbines, the driving force is either impulse or reaction. But, for a Tesla turbine, it's totally different. That's why this equation can't properly define the output IMO.
 
Correct.

The Tesla turbine is very inefficient compared to other turbines. I have yet to see a justified application.

The Tesla turbine is driven by boundary layer drag on the disc surfaces. Those close plates also create a back pressure that blocks the exhaust, reducing efficiency.

Because it has the Tesla name, it receives attention that it does not deserve.
 
  • Like
Likes Averagesupernova and russ_watters
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top