MHB Calculating Boat Costs: Splitting 60/40 & Time Usage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the actual weekly cost of boat maintenance when costs are split 60/40 between two friends. One friend pays 60% of the costs but uses the boat less frequently, having it 5/8 of the time compared to the other friend's 3/8. It is clarified that despite the time usage, the agreed cost split means the first friend pays 60% of the total maintenance cost. However, based on usage, the first friend should actually be responsible for 62.5% of the costs. The conclusion emphasizes that the time spent using the boat impacts the fair distribution of costs.
ger1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am struggling with a calculation.
A boat costs x to maintain and I and a friend decide to split the costs 60/40, where I put in 60% of the cost.
However, I will have the boat less than my friend, he will have it 3/8 of the time and I will have it 5/8 of the time.

So what is my actual cost on a weekly basis - it doesn't seem right to just multiply 60% by 5/8.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ger said:
Hi, I am struggling with a calculation.
A boat costs x to maintain and I and a friend decide to split the costs 60/40, where I put in 60% of the cost.
However, I will have the boat less than my friend, he will have it 3/8 of the time and I will have it 5/8 of the time.

So what is my actual cost on a weekly basis - it doesn't seem right to just multiply 60% by 5/8.
You mean your friend will have the boat less than you since 3/8< 5/8. But if you have already agreed to pay 60% the "5/8 versus 3/8" is irrelevant. The cost to you is .6 times x.

(5/8= 0.625 or 62.5%. You should actually be paying 62.5% of the cost!)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top