Calculating Capacitance: Series vs Parallel

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the calculation of equivalent capacitance for capacitors in series and parallel configurations. It confirms that two capacitors, C1 (4uF) and C2 (6uF), can yield a total of 10uF when considered in parallel, as they share the same potential drop. However, the correct identification of their arrangement is crucial; capacitors are in parallel if their terminals are physically connected at the same nodes. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of understanding the wiring configuration to determine if capacitors are in series or parallel. Overall, accurate identification of connections is essential for correct capacitance calculations.
cupid.callin
Messages
1,130
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

This question was given in my physics book. Given that: C1 = 4uF and C2 = 6uF (u=micro) ... it comes out to be C1 + C2 = 10uF

I used the general method ... you know ... assign charges, assume potentials... solve equations.

My question is that aren't the two capacitors highlighted red in parallel, because i guess they are as the potential drop across them is same, but it doesn't work to get the answer i.e. 10uF.

If they are not in parallel, please tell me how to tell if two capacitors are in series or parallel ...

Thanks for help!
 

Attachments

  • 00978.jpg
    00978.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 499
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
All the C1s are paralleled by C2s as you spotted. There are four such parallel capacitor instances in the given circuit. They can each be replaced with an equivalent capacitance. This reduces the equivalent circuit to four capacitors, all of the same size. There will be two pairs of series-connected capacitors, which are in turn connected in parallel. The series connected pairs can each be reduced to single equivalent capacitors. Then you're left with these two single capacitors in parallel, so rinse, repeat. You're left with one equivalent capacitor.

The result, 10uF for the equivalent capacitance of the whole circuit, is correct.
 
Oh yes,,, you are right!

I don't know what i was thinking while solving the ques. myself!
More sleep!

One more ques.
Two (or more) capacitors are in parallel if the potential drop across them is same ... Right? Or is there any other way to tell if two are in series or parallel ??!
 
cupid.callin said:
Oh yes,,, you are right!

I don't know what i was thinking while solving the ques. myself!
More sleep!

One more ques.
Two (or more) capacitors are in parallel if the potential drop across them is same ... Right? Or is there any other way to tell if two are in series or parallel ??!

Component terminals need to be physically wired together (the same nodes in a circuit diagram) in order to be in parallel. Two capacitors charged to the same voltage but not connected are not in parallel.
 
Thanks for your help gneill !
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
573
Replies
2
Views
887
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K