Calculating Capacitance: Series vs Parallel

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of equivalent capacitance in a circuit involving two capacitors, C1 and C2, with values of 4uF and 6uF respectively. The original poster expresses confusion regarding whether these capacitors are in series or parallel, particularly in relation to the potential drop across them.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply a general method for calculating capacitance but questions the classification of the capacitors as parallel based on their potential drop. Other participants discuss the conditions for capacitors being in parallel and clarify the physical wiring requirements.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the definitions and conditions that determine whether capacitors are in series or parallel. Clarifications have been provided regarding the necessity of physical connections for parallel configurations, and the original poster has acknowledged the input received.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a lack of clarity regarding the classification of capacitors and seeks further understanding of the criteria for series versus parallel arrangements. There is an implication of confusion stemming from the problem setup.

cupid.callin
Messages
1,130
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

This question was given in my physics book. Given that: C1 = 4uF and C2 = 6uF (u=micro) ... it comes out to be C1 + C2 = 10uF

I used the general method ... you know ... assign charges, assume potentials... solve equations.

My question is that aren't the two capacitors highlighted red in parallel, because i guess they are as the potential drop across them is same, but it doesn't work to get the answer i.e. 10uF.

If they are not in parallel, please tell me how to tell if two capacitors are in series or parallel ...

Thanks for help!
 

Attachments

  • 00978.jpg
    00978.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 509
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
All the C1s are paralleled by C2s as you spotted. There are four such parallel capacitor instances in the given circuit. They can each be replaced with an equivalent capacitance. This reduces the equivalent circuit to four capacitors, all of the same size. There will be two pairs of series-connected capacitors, which are in turn connected in parallel. The series connected pairs can each be reduced to single equivalent capacitors. Then you're left with these two single capacitors in parallel, so rinse, repeat. You're left with one equivalent capacitor.

The result, 10uF for the equivalent capacitance of the whole circuit, is correct.
 
Oh yes,,, you are right!

I don't know what i was thinking while solving the ques. myself!
More sleep!

One more ques.
Two (or more) capacitors are in parallel if the potential drop across them is same ... Right? Or is there any other way to tell if two are in series or parallel ??!
 
cupid.callin said:
Oh yes,,, you are right!

I don't know what i was thinking while solving the ques. myself!
More sleep!

One more ques.
Two (or more) capacitors are in parallel if the potential drop across them is same ... Right? Or is there any other way to tell if two are in series or parallel ??!

Component terminals need to be physically wired together (the same nodes in a circuit diagram) in order to be in parallel. Two capacitors charged to the same voltage but not connected are not in parallel.
 
Thanks for your help gneill !
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K