Why Is My Electron-Positron Scattering Cross Section Calculation Incorrect?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the cross-section for electron-positron to muon-antimuon scattering. The initial calculation yielded an incorrect result, prompting the poster to seek assistance. Key issues identified include the integration limits and the proper use of the solid angle element, with clarification that dΩ is equal to sin(θ)dθdφ. The correct integration approach involves integrating over both θ and φ, leading to the accurate cross-section formula. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying integration techniques in particle physics calculations.
Muh. Fauzi M.
Messages
17
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I have a problem in calculating cross-section in elektron-positron -> muon-antimuon scattering.

Homework Equations


In the relativistic limit, we find the differential cross-section of {e}+{e^-} -> {μ}+{μ^-} is

\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}=\frac{\alpha^2}{4s}*(1+cos^2{\theta}).

When I integrating over \theta, i get an answer:

\sigma=\frac{3*\pi*\alpha^2}{8*s},

but that is not the correct answer. Due to my reference (Halzen and Martin), the answer should be

\sigma=\frac{4*\pi*\alpha^2}{3*s}.

The Attempt at a Solution


Can someone help me through this problem? My intuition said I have mistaken the integration. But I've tried to re-integral-ing it, still not come up with correct solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Muh. Fauzi M. said:

Homework Statement


I have a problem in calculating cross-section in electron-positron -> muon-antimuon scattering.

Homework Equations


In the relativistic limit, we find the differential cross-section of ##\ \ {e}^+{e^-} -> {μ}^+{μ^-}## is
$$\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}=\frac{\alpha^2}{4s}\left (1+cos^2{\theta}\right ) \ .$$
When I integrate over ##\theta##, I get an answer:
$$\sigma=\frac{3\pi\alpha^2}{8s}\ ,$$
but that is not the correct answer. Due to my reference (Halzen and Martin), the answer should be
$$\sigma=\frac{4\pi\alpha^2}{3s}\; .$$

The Attempt at a Solution


Can someone help me through this problem? My intuition sais I have mistaken the integration. But I've tried to re-integrate it, still not come up with correct solution.
Hello,

Is ##d\Omega## just ##d\theta## or has ##\phi## something to do with it too ?

Anyway, show your steps in detail, please. That makaes it easier to follow and point out where things may go wrong...
 

BvU said:
Hello,

Is ##d\Omega## just ##d\theta## or has ##\phi## something to do with it too ?

Anyway, show your steps in detail, please. That makaes it easier to follow and point out where things may go wrong...

Hello Mr., thank you for your respond.

In my first reference (Halzen and Martin), the instructor is to integrate over ##\theta## and ##\phi##. Here is my doodling:

$$ \sigma = \frac{\alpha^2}{4s}\int{(1+cos^2{\theta})}d\theta d\phi $$

Substituting the trigonometry identity,

$$ \sigma = \frac{\alpha^2}{4s} \int {\frac{(3+cos{2\theta})}{2}} d\theta d\phi $$.

Dividing the integration,

$$ \int 3 d\theta d\phi , \quad \int {cos{2\theta}}d\theta d\phi $$

and integrating from ## 0 ## to ## \pi ## for ##\theta##, ##0## to ##2\pi## fpr ##\phi##. The second term is vanish, so I have

$$ \int 3 d\theta d\phi=3(\pi)(2\pi)$$.

Thus, when inserting to ## \sigma ##, I have

$$ \sigma = \frac{3\pi^2\alpha^2}{4s} $$.

Using my second ref (Schwartz), the integration just applied over ##\theta## and I get

$$ \sigma = \frac{3\pi\alpha^2}{8s}$$.

Which step do I miss?
 
If I remember well, ##d\Omega \ne d\phi d\theta ## because then you would end up with ##2\pi^2## where you expect ##4\pi## . Wasn't it ##d\Omega = \sin\theta \;d\theta d\phi ## ?
 
BvU said:
If I remember well, ##d\Omega \ne d\phi d\theta ## because then you would end up with ##2\pi^2## where you expect ##4\pi## . Wasn't it ##d\Omega = \sin\theta \;d\theta d\phi ## ?
Speechless. That's true Mr. Thank you very much. (shy)
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
671
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K