Calculating Cross Sectional Area After Cold Working?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Calculating the cross-sectional area of a wire after cold working can be approached using Poisson's ratio, but its accuracy depends on the nature of the deformation. If the elongation is uniform, a constant-volume assumption with Poisson's ratio set to 0.5 may yield reasonable estimates. However, if the deformation involves localized necking, the calculation becomes significantly more complex. For small deformations (around 5%), Poisson's ratio may not be applicable, and alternative measurement methods such as microscopy or micrometry are recommended.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Poisson's ratio in material science
  • Knowledge of cold working processes and their effects on materials
  • Familiarity with concepts of elastic vs. plastic deformation
  • Experience with measurement techniques such as microscopy or micrometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Poisson's ratio in plastic deformation scenarios
  • Learn about constant-volume assumptions in material deformation
  • Explore measurement techniques for cross-sectional area in deformed materials
  • Investigate the effects of localized necking on material properties
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in the analysis of deformed materials and their properties.

scott_alexsk
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Is using Poisson's ratio to calculate the cross sectional area accurate after a material has been extensively cold worked and deformed. For example say I have a wire at some nominal length and thickness (which is too small for me to precisely measure, but I know at the start). So can I calculate the cross sectional area from the initial values say after I cold work the wire and get a 20% increase in length, using Poisson's ratio, or perhaps a calculation based on a constant volume assumption. Or is it impossible to calculate it fairly accurately either way?

Thanks,
-Scott
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the 20% elongation was uniform over the sample, you could try a constant-volume (i.e., Poisson's ratio = 0.5) approach to estimate the new cross section. On the other hand, if the elongation results from a localized region of necking, the problem is much harder.

Why not use a microscope or micrometer to track the cross section?

(I assume you know that the typical Poisson's ratio for metals, 0.3, only applies to elastic deformation.)
 
The deformations I want to give are of the order of 5%, so it does not seem large enough to deem a constant volume correction (to me at least since it's so small and other effects may come into play), and it is plastic so Poisson's ratio does not really apply. I have been considering not bothering.

Thanks,
-Scott
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
947
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K