Calculating Dipole Moment and Potential for Spherical Shell Charge Distribution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter minimark1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the dipole moment and potential of a spherical shell with a charge density defined as \(\sigma = k \cos \theta\). Participants are exploring the implications of this charge distribution on the dipole moment and potential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integral setup for calculating the dipole moment and potential, with some questioning the treatment of the vector \(\vec{r}\) in the calculations. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between the charge distribution and the resulting electric field.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the integral setup and the significance of the charge density. There is an ongoing exploration of whether the charge distribution can be approximated as a dipole and how higher multipole moments might affect the results. Multiple interpretations of the implications of the spherical symmetry are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the challenge of self-teaching from Griffiths' book, which lacks answers and direct support. There is a recognition of the potential complexity introduced by higher multipole moments and the need for further clarification on the implications of the charge distribution's symmetry.

minimark1234
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find:

[tex]\vec{p}[/tex] (dipole moment)
[tex]\itshape V(r,\theta)[/tex] (dipole potential)

of a spherical shell which has a charge area of [tex]\itshape \sigma= k cos \theta[/tex].

Homework Equations


[tex]\itshape \vec{p}= \int\int \vec{r} \sigma (r\stackrel{2}{} sin \theta d\theta d\phi)[/tex]
[tex]\itshape V(r, \theta )= \frac{\hat{R} \bullet \vec{p}}{4 \pi \epsilon R^{2}}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I came up with 0 both times and i know that's wrong. please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Show us your work so we can see where you went wrong.
 


I can tell you that either your integral is wrong or you are not accounting for [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] in the integral. Since I know the equation is correct, you are not accounting for [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] in your calculation.

Do you know what [tex]\vec{r}[/tex] is?
 
Last edited:


Work: OK i re-did the problem this time taking a different approach...

[tex]\itshape\vec{p}=\int^{\pi}_{0}\int^{2\pi}_{0}\vec{r}\sigma\:d\vec{a}[/tex]

[tex]\itshape \sigma=kcos\:\theta\:,\:d\vec{a}=r^{2}sin\:\theta\:d\theta\:d\phi\:\hat{r}\:,\:k=constant[/tex]

so...
[tex]\itshape \vec{p}=\int^{\pi}_{0}\int^{2\pi}_{0}r^{3}k(cos^{2}\:\theta\:sin\:\theta\:sin\:\phi\:\hat{x}\:+\:sin^{2}\:\theta\:cos\:\theta\:cos\:\phi\:\hat{y}\:+\:cos^{2}\:\theta\:sin\:\theta\:\hat{z})\:d\theta\:\:d\phi[/tex]
so when...
[tex]\itshape R\geq\:r\;\Rightarrow\;\vec{p}=\frac{4}{3}\pi r^{3}k\:\hat{z}[/tex]
and when...
[tex]\itshape r\geq\:R\;\Rightarrow\;\vec{p}=\frac{4}{3}\pi R^{3}k\:\hat{z}[/tex]

and finally...
[tex]\itshape \hat{r}\bullet\vec{p}=cos\:\theta\:\hat{z}\bullet\frac{4}{3}\pi r(or\:R)^{3}k\:\hat{z}=\frac{4}{3}\pi r(or\:R)^{3}k\:cos\:\theta\:[/tex]

so when...
[tex]\itshaper R\geq\:r\;\Rightarrow\;V_{dip}(r,\theta)=\frac{kR^{3}}{3\epsilon r^{2}}\:cos\:\theta[/tex]
and when...
[tex]\itshape r\geq\:R\;\Rightarrow\;V_{dip}(r,\theta)=\frac{kr}{3\epsilon}\:cos\:\theta[/tex]
but what disturbs me is i thought i was supposed to be finding an approximate amount of V... and that was the exact answer, did i go wrong somewhere and just get really lucky giving me the exact amount, or am i right... and if I am right what does using a higher multipole change?
 
Last edited:


@jdwood983 the first time i didn't account for [tex]\itshape \vec{r}=r\hat{r}[/tex], and i always forget to because I'm being lazy, the second time i did though.
 
Last edited:


Is it not possible that this charge distribution has exactly the electric field of a certain dipole? In which case higher order terms would not be necessary.
 


I am not sure, nor do i know a way to check that. Is the a formula or and of the given i had above that would tell me this, I'm self teaching Griffiths' book, which has no answers and no teacher to ask, so I'm a bit lost.
 


It is certainly possible, and your result seems like more than a coincidence given what he asks in part b.
 


Because what really drove the integral above was the [tex]\itshape \sigma[/tex] which says that the charge density on the x and y-axis are both k (when z=0) would it be safe to say the the dipole moment will be in the z direction in cases like this? Also because of circle symmetry the net charge is 0 at the origin (I assume is the center) is the V going to be defined as a dipole, which i think might be mentioned in the book?
 
  • #10


It's been too long since I've done this stuff, so I might be totally off here. But I'd guess the result isn't too surprising because [itex]\sigma \propto Y^0_1[/itex], where [itex]Y^m_l[/itex] are the spherical harmonics.
 
  • #11


the whole Y thing went right past me, but what u said i think clarified my final troubles on this problem. Thank you everyone for the help on this problem :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
6K