Calculating Dipole Moment for Equilateral Triangle Distribution of Charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter LabBioRat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole Moments
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the dipole moment for a distribution of charges arranged in an equilateral triangle. The configuration includes a charge of -2q at one vertex and +q charges at the other two vertices, with a separation distance of d between the charges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the vector nature of the dipole moment and question the choice of coordinate system and origin. There are discussions about the implications of the total charge being zero on the dipole moment calculation and the correct treatment of vector notation.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on vector representation and the importance of the origin in calculations. There is recognition of mistakes in the summation of vectors and charges, leading to further clarification and exploration of the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of vector addition and the implications of charge placement on the dipole moment. There is a mix of understanding and confusion regarding the treatment of charges as scalars versus their vector representations.

LabBioRat
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the value of the dipole moment of the distribution of charges.

-2q on top of equilateral triangle
+q on each of the other points. Each charge is separated by distance d.

Homework Equations


p = \sum (q_i)(r_i)


The Attempt at a Solution


p = q(d/2) - q(d/2) +(-2q)(d*\sqrt{3}/2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi LabBioRat, welcome to PF!:smile:

Dipole moment is a vector quantity, but it's not clear from your post whether you are treating it as a vector or a scalar, and what coordinate system and origin you are using...
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Hi LabBioRat, welcome to PF!:smile:

Dipole moment is a vector quantity, but it's not clear from your post whether you are treating it as a vector or a scalar, and what coordinate system and origin you are using...

Gabbagabbahey, thank you for the warm welcome. I am treating dipole moment as a vector quantity in the Cartesian Coordinate system.
 
Okay, and where is the origin of this coordinate system?

And, you should make it clear which quantities are vectors by putting them in bolded letters like this: p; and use i, j and k to represent Cartesian unit vectors.

Or, you can use LaTeX: \vec{p} , \hat{i}
 
Since the total charge of the configuration is 0, the dipole moment does not depend on a specific origin. I choose the origin to be at the (-2q) charge.
 
LabBioRat said:
Since the total charge of the configuration is 0, the dipole moment does not depend on a specific origin.

Yes, that's right:smile:

However it does still depend on how you choose to orient your coordinate system (although it's magnitude will not) ...if the configuration lies entirely in the xy plane it will have a different dipole moment than if it lies in the xz plane...
I choose the origin to be at the (-2q) charge.

Okay, and when you write everything out in vector notation, what do you get?
 
(-2q)(0\widehat{i} + 0\widehat{j})+ q( (-d/2)\widehat{i} -d \sqrt{3} /2\widehat{j} ) +q( (d/2)\widehat{i} -d\sqrt{3} /2\widehat{j} )
= 2q( -d\sqrt{3}\widehat{j} )
 
(-2q)(0\widehat{i} + d\sqrt{3} /2\widehat{j})+ q( (-d/2)\widehat{i} +0\widehat{j} ) +q( (d/2)\widehat{i} + 0\widehat{j} )
= 0q( 0\widehat{i} +d\sqrt{3}/2 \widehat{j} )
 
  • #10
Careful, you dropped the -2q in front of the brackets
 
  • #11
Doesn't the -2q belong on the outside, just like the other charges?
My origin is now at (0,0), and the position of the (-2q) charge is (0, d\sqrt{3}/2).

I do not quite understand your warning.
 
  • #12
You went from -2q(i+\sqrt{3}d/2j) to 0q(i+\sqrt{3}d/2j)

why did -2q become 0q?
 
  • #13
That was after I summed up all of the charges and vectors.
All of the charges evaluated to 0q, and
the vectors from each of the charges all evaluate to ( 0\widehat{i} +d\sqrt{3}/2 \widehat{j} )

Thus my final answer would be 0q( 0\widehat{i} +d\sqrt{3}/2 \widehat{j})

I apologize for the confusion.
 
  • #14
LabBioRat said:
That was after I summed up all of the charges and vectors.
All of the charges evaluated to 0q, and
the vectors from each of the charges all evaluate to ( 0\widehat{i} +d\sqrt{3}/2 \widehat{j} )

Thus my final answer would be 0q( 0\widehat{i} +d\sqrt{3}/2 \widehat{j})

I apologize for the confusion.

No, you don't add the charges and the vectors separately... the charges are scalars that multiply each of the vectors:

-2q\left(0\hat{i}+\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}d\hat{j}\right)=-2\sqrt{3}qd\hat{j}

q\left(\frac{-d}{2}\hat{i}+0\hat{j}\right)=\frac{-qd}{2}\hat{i}

q\left(\frac{d}{2}\hat{i}+0\hat{j}\right)=\frac{qd}{2}\hat{i}

When you add them up, the two vectors pointing in the i direction cancel, but the other one doesn't
 
  • #15
Oh my goodness! Thank you for pointing out that fatal mistake!
 
  • #16
Help me to sort out this problem:: Prove that, "integration over[J(r)dr]=del(p)/del(t)" ... where p is the electric dipole moment ... please as soon as possible, reply me ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
5K