Calculating Divergence of a Function: A Berliner's Struggle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel Jackson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the divergence of the vector function \( v = \frac{\vec{r}}{r^2} \) as presented in Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics" (3rd edition, Problem 1.16). The confusion arises from the transition to the term \( (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^{-3/2} \), which is derived from the need to account for the inverse square law in three-dimensional space. The divergence is calculated using the formula \( \nabla \cdot v = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{x}{r^3}\right) + \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(\frac{y}{r^3}\right) + \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left(\frac{z}{r^3}\right) \), where \( r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically divergence.
  • Familiarity with the concept of the gradient operator (nabla).
  • Knowledge of the inverse square law in physics.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of exponents and roots.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of divergence in three-dimensional vector fields.
  • Learn about the physical implications of the inverse square law in electrodynamics.
  • Explore the properties of the gradient operator and its applications in physics.
  • Practice solving similar problems from Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics".
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for courses in electrodynamics, physicists working with vector fields, and anyone interested in mastering vector calculus concepts.

Daniel Jackson
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I'm preparing myself for the introduction to electrodynamics course and thus I
go through vector analysis, but I hardly understand a problem given in my book
(Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics 3rd edition, page 18, Problem
1.16):

I have to calculate the divergence of the following function:

see pic 1

Ok my problem is, I can't figure it out how the author calculates the result of it. He has the following approach...see pic 2 (between del and v should be a dot, cause it is meant to be the dot product, not the cross product!)

OK...so far, so clear...I understand this step but now, he goes ahead by taking x^2+y^2+z^2 to the power of -3/2. Why?? Where does this fraction of -3/2 comes from? Is there any rule I didn't know? :confused:

Anyway, thanks a lot in advance. Have a nice day...sincere greetings from Berlin, Germany

Daniel Jackson
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    1.5 KB · Views: 515
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    3.3 KB · Views: 490
  • 3.JPG
    3.JPG
    4.2 KB · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm a bit confused. Are these supposed to be three stages in the solution of the problem? That's what they look like but the first is
v= \frac{\vec{r}}{r^2}
while the second is
\nabla \cdot v= \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{x}{r^3}\right)+\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(\frac{y}{r^3}\right)+\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(\frac{y}{r^3}\right).
(Click on the formulas to see the code used.)

Was that supposed to be r3 in the first picture, as in the second? (And do you see the reason for the cube? Since \frac{\vec{r}}{r} is itself a unit vector in the direction of the vector r, \frac{\vec{r}}{r^2} is a vector with length \frac{1}{r^2} in that same direction. While this is an inverse square law, we need the cube in order to account for the length of r itself.)

Assuming that is the case then
r= \sqrt{x^2+ y^2+ z^2}= \left( x^2+ y^2+ z^2)^\frac{1}{2}
so that
r^3= \left(\sqrt{x^2+ y^2+ z^2}\right)^3= \left(x^2+ y^2+ z^2\right)^\frac{3}{2}

of course, the fact that the r3 is in the denominator means we have
\frac{x}{r^3}= \frac{x}{\left(x^2+ y^2+ z^2\right)^\frac{3}{2}}= x\left(x^2+ y^2+ z^2\right)^\frac{-3}{2}
since the negative power corresponds to the term in the denominator (for example, 2^{-1}= \frac{1}{2}).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K