Calculating drag of an object under water(Help)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeeloong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of drag and virtual mass for an object submerged in water, specifically in the context of a final year project on drag reduction in swim caps. Participants explore methods for measuring drag using an accelerometer and discuss the implications of buoyancy, weight, and added mass in the equations of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • JL expresses confusion about measuring drag using an accelerometer and outlines the relevant equations of motion involving buoyancy, weight, and drag forces.
  • Some participants suggest using acceleration vs time data in conjunction with a mathematical model for drag, emphasizing the need to consider the orientation of the accelerometer.
  • One participant notes that calculating virtual mass is complex and suggests that it may not be necessary if the object moves at constant velocity.
  • Another participant proposes that achieving terminal velocity quickly could simplify the experiment and suggests using ballast to adjust buoyancy.
  • Several participants question the appropriateness of using an accelerometer for measuring drag, suggesting it may not provide the best data for this purpose.
  • One participant mentions the possibility of using Oseen equations to characterize drag if the accelerometer is placed inside a sphere.
  • JL shares experimental observations, noting differences in behavior with and without added mass in the bottle, but remains uncertain about the acceleration status during tests.
  • Another participant discusses the relationship between added mass, buoyancy, and drag force, suggesting a method to eliminate unknowns in the equations through comparative experiments with different masses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the best methods for measuring drag and the role of virtual mass, with no consensus on the optimal approach or the effectiveness of the accelerometer in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of measuring virtual mass and drag, noting that the effectiveness of the accelerometer may depend on its orientation and the specific experimental setup. The discussion includes various assumptions about the conditions under which measurements are taken, such as the need to reach terminal velocity.

jeeloong
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Dear Experts,

I really need help with the calculation of virtual mass and drag of an object.
Firstly, I am doing final year project called Drag reduction in swim cap. Before I go into using swim cap. I am try to measure the drag using accelerometer that inside a bottle but I am damn confuse... the requirement is just equations of motion according to my supervisor.

F_Buoyancy = buoyancy force = density, displaced volume x gravity
F_Drag = Drag force = Cd. 1/2 x density . Velocity^2 . Area
F_w = weight = mass x gravity

ok when an object rises F_B > F_W which means the object accelerate up. If we include drag after some point terminal velocity will reach and the object no longer accelerate.
when F_B < F_W the object sinks

I was told to calculate virtual mass which is the mass added when the object pushes a finite amount of water away when it accelerates

The equation of motion can be given as

F_B - F_W - F_D = (m + mh)a
Where mh is added mass.

I really wondering how do I measured the drag by using accerelometer? :confused:
I already launch the object from water and the accelerometer show the g-force either increasing or decrease depends on how I point it.

I am very grateful if some dynamic people could point it out.

Regards,
JL
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I really wondering how do I measured the drag by using accerelometer?
You need to use the acceleration vs time data in conjunction with a mathematical model for drag.
That's where the equations come in.

You may need to model mh in terms of the instantaneous speed of the bottle and it's cross-section area.

Your accelerometer reads differently with different orientations perhaps because acceleration is a vector.
Is it measuring the component of the acceleration in the direction it is pointing in?

(By g-force, you mean that your accelerometer measures acceleration in units of g?)
 
jeeloong said:
I was told to calculate virtual mass which is the mass added when the object pushes a finite amount of water away when it accelerates

The equation of motion can be given as

F_B - F_W - F_D = (m + mh)a
Where mh is added mass.

Two comments:

1. Calculating the virtual mass is very hard, compared with everything else in your OP.
2. If a = 0 (i.e. the velocity is constant), the virtual mass has no effect, so you don't need it.

The easiest way to do fluid flow experiments is at constant velocity, not when things are accelerating.
 
I was thinking that the situation needs to be finessed so the bottle gets it's terminal velocity very quickly... ie. ballast to make it only a little buoyant.
 
Yup, that's the standard way to measure drag forces.

An accelerometer seems like the wrong measuring device to use for this.
 
The only use I can think for it would be to have a record for when the acceleration is zero.
Maybe an acceleration-time curve can be interpolated to find the speed for constant velocity?
Drag is different for different speeds.

However - as an assigned project "use this sub-optimal equipment to make the following measurement" would be a common learning exercise. I'm seeing a few odd projects using accelerometers cropping up recently - tech du jour I guess.
 
Simon Bridge said:
The only use I can think for it would be to have a record for when the acceleration is zero.
Maybe an acceleration-time curve can be interpolated to find the speed for constant velocity?
Drag is different for different speeds.

However - as an assigned project "use this sub-optimal equipment to make the following measurement" would be a common learning exercise. I'm seeing a few odd projects using accelerometers cropping up recently - tech du jour I guess.

Hi, Thanks for the reply
I got this data doing the test using a bottle with accelerometer fitted. The first one is without mass inside just accelerometer. The center of mass is not aligned with the bottle and it shot up very fast(haven't reach constant velocity/terminal I guess).

The second test I put nickel and silver penny inside and the object rises constantly by using naked eye but I am not sure whether it is still accelerating. And the good part is the bottle is very straight almost normal to the water surface!
 

Attachments

  • AccelerometerVeryImportantCore2.jpg
    AccelerometerVeryImportantCore2.jpg
    26.7 KB · Views: 573
  • AccelerationCore2(Stable).jpg
    AccelerationCore2(Stable).jpg
    29.4 KB · Views: 609
AlephZero said:
Yup, that's the standard way to measure drag forces.

An accelerometer seems like the wrong measuring device to use for this.

Hello I got the follow result
1) Bottle with accelerometer and off center of mass
2) Bottle with acc with aligned center of mass

I already attach the image in Simon posts, can't duplicate. Thx!
 
  • #10
Simon Bridge said:
I was thinking that the situation needs to be finessed so the bottle gets it's terminal velocity very quickly... ie. ballast to make it only a little buoyant.

Yeah, I need to reach terminal velocity as quickly as possible. My supervisor mention getting terminal velocity correctly is a challenge. my water tank is about 3m depth.
 
  • #11
Thinking about it, you could probably measure the added mass effect in this experiment. (As a native English speaker I think "calculate" means "do a theoretical calculation," but that might not be what you and supervisor meant).

The added mass only depends on the shape of the object, not on its real mass. The same is true for the buoyancy force. The drag force F_D depends on the shape, and also the velocity.

So, if you can do two experiments with different masses m1 and m2, and measure the accelerations at the same velocity, you have
##F_B - F_{W_1} - F_D = (m_1 + m_h)a_1##
##F_B - F_{W_2} - F_D = (m_2 + m_h)a_2##
and you can eliminate the unknown drag force ##F_D## to find ##m_h##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K