Calculating Eigenvalue for 3D Matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter gaffareee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Eigenvalue
Click For Summary
To calculate the eigenvalues of a 3D matrix, the equation A - λI must be solved, where A is the matrix and I is the identity matrix. The discussion highlights that traditional mathematical software typically handles only 2D matrices, complicating the calculation for 3D matrices. The eigenvalue λ is defined such that there exists a non-zero vector v satisfying (A - λI)v = 0, indicating that the determinant of A - λI must equal zero. For the given 3D matrix of ones, the determinant can be calculated to derive a cubic equation in λ, which may yield up to three eigenvalues. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effectively finding eigenvalues beyond software limitations.
gaffareee
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Dear frnds,

suppose one have a 3D matrix,

A=ones(3,3,3);

he wants to have eigen value of A,
then,

A-Lamda*I=0 where A is 3D matrix, I is 3D matrix.
now

Problem is our mathematical soft can only do 2D inversion or eigen calculation.
Please refer me any info to find out the eigenvalue of 3d matrix.

thanks anyway.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, what do you mean by "ones(3,3,3)"? if there were only two "3"s I would interpret that as
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 1\\ 1 & 1 & 1\end{bmatrix}
the 3 by 3 matrix consisting of all "1"s.

Do you only know how to use software to find eigenvalues? What about determinants? I think you have found a problem with relying on software! Do you know the definition of "eigenvalue"?

One of the things you need to know is that A- \lambda I does NOT have to be the 0 vector, although, if you really meant "ones(3,3)", that does happen. A number, \lambda, is an eigenvalue if and only if there exist a non-zero vector v such that (A- \lambda I)v= 0.

To find the eigenvalues of a 3 by 3 matrix, use the fact that if (A- \lambda)v= 0 for a non-zero vector, then the matrix A- \lambda I, which is just A with the variable \lambda subtracted from each of its diagonal elements), while it is not necessarily 0, cannot have an inverse and so its determinant must be 0.

For the matrix above, that means you need to solve
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}1-\lambda & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 1-\lambda & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 1-\lambda\end{array}\right|= 0
That will give a cubic equation in \lambda which might have up to three different roots. Since it should be clear that the determinant of A itself if 0, one of those roots should be obvious.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks for your kind reply.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K