Calculating Electric Field from a Charged Filament

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electric field generated by a charged filament with a linear charge density of \(\lambda = -2.7 \, \text{nC/m}\). The correct formula for the electric field at a distance \(r = 0.67 \, \text{mm}\) from the filament is \(E = \frac{2k\lambda}{r}\), where \(k = 8.99 \times 10^9 \, \text{N m}^2/\text{C}^2\). The participants clarified that the factor of 2 arises from integrating the contributions of infinitesimal charge elements along the filament. The final calculated electric field is \(E = 72000 \, \text{N/C}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and the constant \(k\)
  • Basic knowledge of calculus for integration
  • Ability to manipulate units in physics calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the electric field from a line charge using integration techniques
  • Learn about Gauss's law and its application to electric fields
  • Explore the differences between finite and infinite charge distributions
  • Review examples of electric field calculations for various charge configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators teaching electromagnetism, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields generated by charged objects.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143

Homework Statement


A long glass filament carries a charge density \lambda = - 2.7{\rm{ nC/m}} . What is the magnitude of the electric field 0.67 mm from the filament?

The Attempt at a Solution



Did I do this problem correctly? I'm guessing not because my answer has an extra /m . Shouldn't it simply be N/C?
<br /> E = \left| {\frac{{k\,d\lambda }}{{r^2 }}} \right| = \left| {\frac{{8.99 \times 10^9 {\rm{N}} \cdot \frac{{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{2}} }}{{{\rm{C}}^{\rm{2}} }} \cdot - 2.7{\rm{ nC/m}} \cdot 10^{ - 9} {\rm{C/nC}}}}{{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.67mm}} \cdot 0.001{\rm{m/mm}}}}} \right| = 54000000{\rm{ N/Cm}}<br />
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't the filament a long line of charge? So, the field strength is proportional to 1/r.
 
Basically, except isn't E=2*k*lambda/r? I think you missed a '2'. Your equation is for the infinitesimal element of E before it is integrated.
 
Thanks. Ok, then would it be:
E = \left| {\frac{{2k\lambda }}{r}} \right| = \left| {\frac{{2 \cdot 8.99 \times 10^9 {\rm{N}} \cdot \frac{{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{2}} }}{{{\rm{C}}^{\rm{2}} }}\left( { - 2.7{\rm{nC/m}} \cdot 10^{ - 9} {\rm{C/nC}}} \right)}}{{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.67mm}} \cdot 0.001{\rm{m/mm}}}}} \right| = 72000\,{\rm{N/C}}
?
Where did E=2k*lambda/r come from? Is this just a standard formula I can use as a starting point, or would I be expected to integrate and come up with this formula?
 
I know it's k*lambda/r. I had to look it up to get the numerical factor of 2. Just looking at the problem statement, it doesn't look like a 'derive the formula' type problem, though the derivation isn't that hard. I would suspect the formula is in your book or notes and you can just use it. Check though.
 
Thanks. I'd like to understand how to do it even if we can start with the formula. Awvvu's link shows how. Stay tuned... I might have questions about that link.
 
I though of another way. From our class notes, we did the integration of the same problem, except the filament had a finite length. The formula was <br /> {\overrightarrow {E_y } = \frac{{k\lambda L}}{{y^2 \sqrt {1 + \left( {\frac{L}{{2y}}} \right)^2 } }}}<br />

To convert this to use for an infinite length:

As L approaches infinity, the 1 under the radical becomes insignificant, allowing me to eliminate it and replace <br /> \sqrt {\left( {\frac{L}{{2y}}} \right)^2 } <br /> with {\frac{L}{{2y}}}.
. Then my L's cancel leaving me with \frac{{2k\lambda }}{y}

Thanks for checking my work. I probably would have submitted my original attempt if the two of you didn't correct me.
 
That works fine. Glad you got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K