Power drawn by a water pump to project water through nozzle

omoplata
Messages
327
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


[/B]
This is problem 10.27 in the Exercises for the Feynman Lectures on Physics, or Problem C-2 in Chapter 10 of Leighton and Vogt's Exercises in Introductory Physics.

FumEIzI.png


Homework Equations



Using ##v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2 a S## for the water in the vertical direction, we can find the initial velocity ##v_i## of the water. ##v_f## is the final velocity, ##a## is the acceleration (or in this case the deceleration), ##S## is the distance traveled.

I can use ##P = x \rho g## to find the pressure difference the pump has to overcome, where ##x## is the height the water has to climb, ##\rho## is the density of water, and ##g## is the gravitational field.

##F = P A## to find the force necessary, where ##A## is the cross sectional area of the nozzle.

##Q = F v## to find the rate of work done on the water, where ##v## is the velocity of the water.

Then I can divide by 60% to find the actual power consumption of the motor.

The Attempt at a Solution



nhoCbFY.jpg


The initial vertical velocity is ##v_i = v \sin(30^{\circ}) = v/2##. The vertical velocity at the apex is 0. Acceleration is ##-g##. Vertical distance is ##h##. Therefore,
$$0 = \left( \frac v 2 \right) ^2 - 2\ g\ h
\\v = \sqrt{8\ g\ h}$$
So I can find the velocity ##v## of the water. To find the pressure difference,
$$P = x\ \rho\ g$$
To find the force,
$$F = P\ A = x\ \rho\ g\ A$$
To find the power expended on the water,
$$Q = F\ v = x\ \rho\ g\ A\ \sqrt{8\ g\ h}$$
I'm going to use the following conversion factors.
$$1\ \rm{sq\ in} = 6.45 \times 10^{-4}\ \rm{m^2}
\\1\ \rm{ft} = 3.05 \times 10^{-1}\ \rm{m}
\\1\ \rm{lb\ ft^{-3}} = 1.60 \times 10^1 \rm{kg\ m^{-3}}$$
After calculation, I get ##Q = 1.66 \times 10^3 \rm{W}##. After dividing by 60%, I get ##2.77 \times 10^3 \rm{W}##, or ##2.77\rm{kW}##. The answer given in the book is ##25\rm{kW}##. Where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pump needs to give the water its kinetic energy as well as lift the water. Rather than relate power to force, it might be easier to relate power to energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
170
Views
9K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K