Calculating Electric Field from a Charged Filament

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field generated by a long charged filament with a specific charge density. Participants are examining the appropriate formula to use and the implications of the charge distribution on the electric field strength at a given distance from the filament.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correct formula for the electric field due to a line charge, questioning the presence of a numerical factor and the need for integration. There is also an exploration of whether the problem requires deriving the formula or if it can be applied directly.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active with participants providing corrections and clarifications regarding the formula for the electric field. Some express a desire to understand the derivation process, while others suggest that the formula may be readily available in their resources.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a previous problem involving a finite-length filament, which participants relate to the current infinite-length scenario. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their initial calculations and the implications of the charge density on the electric field.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143

Homework Statement


A long glass filament carries a charge density \lambda = - 2.7{\rm{ nC/m}} . What is the magnitude of the electric field 0.67 mm from the filament?

The Attempt at a Solution



Did I do this problem correctly? I'm guessing not because my answer has an extra /m . Shouldn't it simply be N/C?
<br /> E = \left| {\frac{{k\,d\lambda }}{{r^2 }}} \right| = \left| {\frac{{8.99 \times 10^9 {\rm{N}} \cdot \frac{{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{2}} }}{{{\rm{C}}^{\rm{2}} }} \cdot - 2.7{\rm{ nC/m}} \cdot 10^{ - 9} {\rm{C/nC}}}}{{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.67mm}} \cdot 0.001{\rm{m/mm}}}}} \right| = 54000000{\rm{ N/Cm}}<br />
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't the filament a long line of charge? So, the field strength is proportional to 1/r.
 
Basically, except isn't E=2*k*lambda/r? I think you missed a '2'. Your equation is for the infinitesimal element of E before it is integrated.
 
Thanks. Ok, then would it be:
E = \left| {\frac{{2k\lambda }}{r}} \right| = \left| {\frac{{2 \cdot 8.99 \times 10^9 {\rm{N}} \cdot \frac{{{\rm{m}}^{\rm{2}} }}{{{\rm{C}}^{\rm{2}} }}\left( { - 2.7{\rm{nC/m}} \cdot 10^{ - 9} {\rm{C/nC}}} \right)}}{{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.67mm}} \cdot 0.001{\rm{m/mm}}}}} \right| = 72000\,{\rm{N/C}}
?
Where did E=2k*lambda/r come from? Is this just a standard formula I can use as a starting point, or would I be expected to integrate and come up with this formula?
 
I know it's k*lambda/r. I had to look it up to get the numerical factor of 2. Just looking at the problem statement, it doesn't look like a 'derive the formula' type problem, though the derivation isn't that hard. I would suspect the formula is in your book or notes and you can just use it. Check though.
 
Thanks. I'd like to understand how to do it even if we can start with the formula. Awvvu's link shows how. Stay tuned... I might have questions about that link.
 
I though of another way. From our class notes, we did the integration of the same problem, except the filament had a finite length. The formula was <br /> {\overrightarrow {E_y } = \frac{{k\lambda L}}{{y^2 \sqrt {1 + \left( {\frac{L}{{2y}}} \right)^2 } }}}<br />

To convert this to use for an infinite length:

As L approaches infinity, the 1 under the radical becomes insignificant, allowing me to eliminate it and replace <br /> \sqrt {\left( {\frac{L}{{2y}}} \right)^2 } <br /> with {\frac{L}{{2y}}}.
. Then my L's cancel leaving me with \frac{{2k\lambda }}{y}

Thanks for checking my work. I probably would have submitted my original attempt if the two of you didn't correct me.
 
That works fine. Glad you got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K