Calculating Forces in a Static Equilibrium Bridge System

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating forces in a static equilibrium bridge system, specifically focusing on a uniform bar supported by two posts. The calculations show that the force on the leftmost support (F_l) is determined to be 1200 N downward, which is confirmed as correct by participants. There is confusion regarding the equilibrium state of the bridge, with some participants questioning the feasibility of the setup. The importance of using moments about the right-hand post for quicker calculations is highlighted, along with a critique of the problem's wording. Overall, the calculations and concepts of static equilibrium are affirmed as valid despite initial doubts about the scenario's plausibility.
akan
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/5393/bridgeef8.png
http://g.imageshack.us/img150/bridgeef8.png/1/

Sum(T_z) [pivot at L] = 2 F_r - 4 mg = 0
2 F_r = 4 mg
F_r = 2 mg
F_r = 2 * 120 * 10
F_r = 2400

Sum(F_y) = F_l + F_r - mg = 0
Sum(F_y) = F_l + 2400 - 1200 = 0
F_l = -1200

Answer: 1200 N downward. Is this right? This picture seems to portray an impossible equilibrium, so I'm confused. I think the right end should actually bring the whole thing down by overwheighing...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi akan! :smile:

I can't get your picture links to work. :cry:

Can you describe the bridge? :smile:
 
Why can't you get it to work? It's on Image Shack. :S.
Anyway, my description will be weird, but so is the picture - so bear with me.

Problem statement:
A uniform bar of length 8.0 m and mass 120 kg is supported by two vertical posts spaced by 2.0 m, see the figure. Calculate the force on the leftmost support (magnitude and direction!).

Note: please use g = 10 m/s^2 for simplicity. Show all work.

Picture description:
There is a horizontal bridge, whose length is 8 meters. The leftmost end is supported by an upright post support. There is another post support 2 meters to the right from the left one. The force of gravity acts at the center of mass, so I understand it is 4 meters from the leftmost end (or, likewise, the rightmost one). There are no other supports besides these two, so I don't know how there is an equilibrium. But that's the whole problem, as it is stated. Thanks. :)
 
akan said:
Sum(T_z) [pivot at L] = 2 F_r - 4 mg = 0
2 F_r = 4 mg
F_r = 2 mg
F_r = 2 * 120 * 10
F_r = 2400

Sum(F_y) = F_l + F_r - mg = 0
Sum(F_y) = F_l + 2400 - 1200 = 0
F_l = -1200

Answer: 1200 N downward. Is this right? This picture seems to portray an impossible equilibrium, so I'm confused. I think the right end should actually bring the whole thing down by overwheighing...
akan said:
Why can't you get it to work? It's on Image Shack. :S.
Anyway, my description will be weird, but so is the picture - so bear with me.

Hi akan! :smile:

hmm … picture works fine now … it shows up as part of the post … didn't yesterday … mystery :confused:

good description, anyway! :smile:

Yup … 1200N is correct …

though it would have been a lot quicker if you'd just taken moments about the right-hand post, wouldn't it? :wink:

I agree the question is badly worded … "support" begins with "sup", which is the same as "sub", from the Latin meaning "under". :mad:

The equilibrium is as expected … you have equal forces (1200N) at equal distances from the right-hand post, so the whole thing is balanced on that post! :smile:
 
I'm trying to solve a similar problem using this example, but I'm confused as to where the 4 comes from in the first equation:

Sum(T_z) [pivot at L] = 2 F_r - 4 mg = 0
 
Nevermind, it is the downward force due to gravity that is causing a torque force rotating about the axis denoted by L.

Just tired this afternoon... :)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K