MHB Calculating Frequency, Midpoint, Relative Frequency and Cumulative Frequency

  • Thread starter Thread starter freedomdorm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Relative
freedomdorm
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I like Serena said:
Hi rihnavy! Welcome to MHB! ;)

By dividing the range into 5 equal parts.
The minimum is 0 and the maximum is 49.
So pick 0-9, 10-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49.

Hello,
If the lowest class limit is 0-9 then how do I figure out the frequency, Midpoint, Relative frequency, and cumulative frequency?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
freedomdorm said:
Hello,
If the lowest class limit is 0-9 then how do I figure out the frequency, Midpoint, Relative frequency, and cumulative frequency?

Hey freedomdorm!

I saw you posted this update on to another question so I gave you your own thread. Are you curious about the other question or do you have a new problem you'd like us to look at? :)
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Thread 'Useless continued fraction for 1'

I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Frequency Distribution: Time Reading Political Blog
Replies
1
Views
3K
MHB Construct a frequency distribution using 5 classes
Replies
1
Views
11K
Modern Digital Audio: Understanding Dither and Oversampling in Hi-Res Age
Replies
17
Views
4K
Is the median from a cumulative frequency graph accurate?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Class Limits, Midpoints, Frequencies
Replies
11
Views
3K
Answering Questions About ∞: Arithmetic Operators, Results & More
Replies
15
Views
3K
Deciphering a coordinate system in an XML file
Replies
3
Views
2K
How to calculate dark count from data collected?
Replies
11
Views
2K
Finding the Median with Class Scores
Replies
8
Views
4K
Simple harmonic motion and frequency; answer disagrees from answer key
Replies
1
Views
14K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top