Calculating Frictional Force: m=0.2kg h1=1.65m h2=0m v1=0m/s v2=4.02m/s"

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the frictional force acting on a mass as it moves down a ramp. The parameters provided include mass, initial and final heights, and velocities, with participants exploring the relationship between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to calculate the frictional force, including using kinematics and energy methods. Questions arise regarding the meaning of height variables, the need for distance, and the appropriate use of average versus final velocity in calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and guidance on how to approach the problem. Some participants express uncertainty about the necessary parameters, while others clarify the importance of specific values like distance and velocity in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of consensus on the correct approach, particularly regarding the use of average velocity versus final velocity. Additionally, some participants mention constraints related to their current educational exposure to energy concepts and kinematics.

raman911
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Frictional Fore


m=0.2kg
h1=1.65m
h2=0m
v1=0m/s
v2=4.02m/s


http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/7201/11ei1.png

Calculate the frictinal Force
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
i might be able to help - but what does the 'h' stand for
 
Well? What have you done so far?

Hint: There are two ways to go about this: (1) you can calculate the acceleration using kinematics and use that to find the net force, or (2) you can use energy methods.
 
Kinetic Energy1=0J
Kinetic Energy1=2.1J
Gravitational Potential Energy1 =2.3J
Gravitational Potential Energy2 =0J
 
Doc Al said:
Well? What have you done so far?

Hint: There are two ways to go about this: (1) you can calculate the acceleration using kinematics and use that to find the net force, or (2) you can use energy methods.

how vcan i find acceleration i haven't time
 
The net force is equal to mass*acceleration
 
dvyu said:
The net force is equal to mass*acceleration
i know but how can i find net force and acceleration
 
you need to use perpendicular and parallel components
 
Kinetic Energy1=0J
Kinetic Energy1=2.1J
Gravitational Potential Energy1 =2.3J
Gravitational Potential Energy2 =0J
 
  • #10
I haven't done energy yet at school - I would have to use kinematics, sorry
 
  • #11
[tex]Given[/tex]
[tex]m=0.2kg[/tex]
[tex]\Delta d=0m[/tex]
[tex]{v}_{1}=0m/s[/tex]
[tex]{v}_{2}=3.96m/s[/tex]
[tex]{h}_{1}=1.65m[/tex]
[tex]{h}_{2}=0m[/tex]

[tex]Required[/tex]

[tex]{F}_{f}[/tex]

[tex]Solution[/tex]

[tex]v_{ave} = (v_1 + v_2)/2[/tex]
[tex]v_{ave} = (0m/s + 4.02m/s)/2[/tex]
[tex]v_{ave} = 2.01m/s[/tex]

[tex]\Delta t = \Delta \vec d/\Delta v_{ave}[/tex]
[tex]\Delta t = 2.52m/2.01m/s[/tex]
[tex]\Delta t = 1.25s[/tex]

[tex]\vec a = \Delta v / \Delta t[/tex]
[tex]\vec a = (2.01m/s) / 1.25s[/tex]
[tex]\vec a = 1.608m/s^2[/tex]
[tex]{E}_{T}={m}g\Delta h[/tex]
[tex]={0.2kg}*9.8N/kg*1.65m[/tex]
[tex]{E}_{g}=3.234J[/tex][tex]{E}_{k}=(1/2)m{v}_{ave}^2[/tex]
[tex]=(1/2)0.2Kg(2.01m/s)^2[/tex]
[tex]{E}_{k}=0.40J[/tex]

[tex]{E}_{T}={E}_{k}+{W}_{f}[/tex]
[tex]3.234J=0.40J+\vec F_{f}\Delta d[/tex]
[tex]3.234J=0.40J+\vec F_{f}2.52m[/tex]
[tex]\vec F_{f}=2.834J/2.52m[/tex]
[tex]\vec F_{f}=1.112N[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #12
nexxxt?/
 
  • #13
raman911 said:
how vcan i find acceleration i haven't time
You don't need time--you have distance and speed.
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
You don't need time--you have distance and speed.

i have height

i have n't distance
 
  • #15
raman911 said:
Kinetic Energy1=0J
Kinetic Energy1=2.1J
Gravitational Potential Energy1 =2.3J
Gravitational Potential Energy2 =0J
Hint: If there were no friction, the mechanical energy would be constant. The loss of mechanical energy equals the work done by friction. (I did not check your calculations, but don't round off until the last step. Two digits is not accurate enough.)
 
  • #16
syou mean distace is 1.65m
 
  • #17
raman911 said:
i have height

i have n't distance
Do you have the angle made by the ramp? (I can't read the writing on the diagram.)
 
  • #18
Doc Al said:
Do you have the angle made by the ramp? (I can't read the writing on the diagram.)

i have not angle
only that

m=0.2kg
h1=1.65m
h2=0m
v1=0m/s
v2=4.02m/s


http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/7201/11ei1.png

Calculate the frictinal Force
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
If you don't have the distance over which the friction acts (or enough info to figure it out) I don't see how you can determine the friction force. (Sorry for not catching that earlier.)

After all, if the ramp were 100 m long you'd need much less friction than if it were 1 m long.
 
  • #20
Doc Al said:
If you don't have the distance over which the friction acts (or enough info to figure it out) I don't see how you can determine the friction force. (Sorry for not catching that earlier.)

After all, if the ramp were 100 m long you'd need much less friction than if it were 1 m long.
d=2.52m...
 
  • #21
raman911 said:
d=2.52m...
So you do know the distance after all? If so, you'll all set. Find the change in mechanical energy and set it equal to the work done by friction.
 
  • #22
Doc Al said:
So you do know the distance after all? If so, you'll all set. Find the change in mechanical energy and set it equal to the work done by friction.

[tex]{E}_{T}={m}g\Delta h[/tex]
[tex]={0.2kg}*9.8N/kg*1.65m[/tex]
[tex]{E}_{g}=3.234J[/tex][tex]{E}_{k}=(1/2)m{v}_{ave}^2[/tex]
[tex]=(1/2)0.2Kg(2.01m/s)^2[/tex]
[tex]{E}_{k}=0.40J[/tex]

[tex]{E}_{T}={E}_{k}+{W}_{f}[/tex]
[tex]3.234J=0.40J+\vec F_{f}\Delta d[/tex]
[tex]3.234J=0.40J+\vec F_{f}2.52m[/tex]
[tex]\vec F_{f}=2.834J/2.52m[/tex]
[tex]\vec F_{f}=1.112N[/tex]
Is that Right Now?
 
Last edited:
  • #23
Why did you take the average velocity?? v2 is the velocity of the block at the end of the ramp. You need to know the kinetic energy at the end of the ramp.

Why did you start a new post? I see you already have a post for this question. It makes it confusing when there is more than one.
 
  • #24
hage567 said:
Why did you take the average velocity?? v2 is the velocity of the block at the end of the ramp. You need to know the kinetic energy at the end of the ramp.

Why did you start a new post? I see you already have a post for this question. It makes it confusing when there is more than one.
so i need to use v2
 
  • #25
Yes you need to use v2, but in the proper way. Why did you think the average velocity was what you wanted?
 
  • #26
raman911 said:
[tex]{E}_{T}={m}g\Delta h[/tex]
[tex]={0.2kg}*9.8N/kg*1.65m[/tex]
[tex]{E}_{g}=3.234J[/tex]
This looks good. Initially, the energy of the mass is purely PE (KE = 0).

[tex]{E}_{k}=(1/2)m{v}_{ave}^2[/tex]
[tex]=(1/2)0.2Kg(2.01m/s)^2[/tex]
[tex]{E}_{k}=0.40J[/tex]
Why did you use the average velocity?? You need the final energy when the mass reaches the bottom of the ramp (PE = 0).

[tex]{E}_{T}={E}_{k}+{W}_{f}[/tex]
[tex]3.234J=0.40J+\vec F_{f}\Delta d[/tex]
[tex]3.234J=0.40J+\vec F_{f}2.52m[/tex]
[tex]\vec F_{f}=2.834J/2.52m[/tex]
[tex]\vec F_{f}=1.112N[/tex]
Is that Right Now?
The method is correct, but the answer is not--redo the final KE calculation.

(Note: Threads merged--one thread per problem, please!)​
 
Last edited:
  • #27
Doc Al said:
This looks good. Initially, the energy of the mass is purely PE (KE = 0).


Why did you use the average velocity?? You need the final energy when the mass reaches the bottom of the ramp (PE = 0).


The method is correct, but the answer is not--redo the final KE calculation.

(Note: Threads merged--one thread per problem, please!)​

[tex]{E}_{T}={m}g\Delta h[/tex]
[tex]={0.2kg}*9.8N/kg*1.65m[/tex]
[tex]{E}_{g}=3.234J[/tex]


[tex]{E}_{k}=(1/2)m{v}^2[/tex]
[tex]=(1/2)0.2Kg(4.02m/s)^2[/tex]
[tex]{E}_{k}=1.61J[/tex]

[tex]{E}_{T}={E}_{k}+{W}_{f}[/tex]
[tex]3.234J=1.61J+\vec F_{f}\Delta d[/tex]
[tex]3.234J=1.61J+\vec F_{f}2.52m[/tex]
[tex]\vec F_{f}=1.61J/2.52m[/tex]
[tex]\vec F_{f}=0.64N[/tex]
Is that Right Now?
 
  • #28
Looks good to me.
 
  • #29
Energy

If No mechanical Energy Was Lost How Would The Gravitational Energy At The Top Compare With The Kinetic Energy At The Bottom?
 
Last edited:
  • #30
What do you think?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K