Calculating gradual chamber filling (CO2 displacing air)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of gradually filling a chamber with CO2 while displacing air, focusing on the mechanics of gas distribution, mixing, and the implications for experimental outcomes. Participants explore theoretical and practical considerations related to the setup and operation of the chamber.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the attachment of the CO2 tube to the chamber and how air is displaced during the filling process.
  • One participant describes the chamber setup, noting the size of the hole for the CO2 tube and the presence of an air filter, asserting that the gas distribution pattern is not relevant for their needs.
  • Another participant highlights the importance of missing information, such as whether the required graph is based on volume or mass, and the system's temperature and pressure.
  • Two extreme mixing scenarios are proposed: one where CO2 sinks to the bottom, creating layers, and another where there is perfect mixing of CO2 and air, with the reality likely falling somewhere in between.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the ethical implications of the experiment, particularly in relation to its biological context, and the need for clarity on the experiment's purpose.
  • A question is posed about the flow rate of CO2, specifically whether it is measured before or after entering a valve, along with inquiries about pressure conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the relevance of gas distribution patterns and the importance of mixing, indicating that multiple competing perspectives exist without a clear consensus on the best approach or methodology.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the information provided, such as missing details about the experimental setup and the need for ethical considerations related to the biological aspects of the experiment.

Mahdivets
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Hi guys. I need to calculate the gradual filling up of a chamber with CO2 gas for biological test according to international guidelines. So I need is to know what is the speed of CO2 piling up in the chamber. In short, the chamber has 5653.5 cm^3 volume filled up with normal air.
The CO2 tube is being inserted into the chamber, and the CO2 valve gets open and 100% co2 gas with the speed of 3L/min rushes into the chamber. Now, the question is what is the graph, replacing air with Co2 looks like? how should we change it in order to adjust the filling speed.
Relevant Equations
It is critical for us to calculate the exact ratio of filling up the chamber with right speed of Co2. while the percentage of co2 concentration rises up according to our needs. So, we should reach the concentration of about 20% in 50 second, and 30% in 100 second, and 50% in 200 second (see the attached). the numbers are not exact so some degree of flexibility is ok.
12e99c7d-dc08-40c4-a760-fabac1a1ed8f.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Mahdivets said:
The CO2 tube is being inserted into the chamber
View attachment 317847
How is the tube attached to the chamber? How does the air in the chamber leave as it is displaced by the CO2? How will the distribution of the CO2 in the chamber as it fills affect the experiment?
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF.How is the tube attached to the chamber? How does the air in the chamber leave as it is displaced by the CO2? How will the distribution of the CO2 in the chamber as it fills affect the experiment?

Thank you Berkeman.

The lid on the chamber has a hole size of the CO2 tube( 4mm) which the tube is inserted in. In addition there is an air filter placed with multiple holes in it. All together these small holes makeup of approximately (1*1 cm) (see the attached). The gas distribution pattern is not relevant for our need, and any distribution pattern is fine.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4628.jpg
    IMG_4628.jpg
    43.6 KB · Views: 183
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi @Mahdivets. A few thoughts...

Missing information includes:
- if the required graph is % by volume or % by mass (weight);
- the system’s temperature and pressure;
- the mixing requirements (as already hinted at by @berkeman) – see below.

It sounds like there are 2 extreme mixing possibilities, each leading to a different graph:

Extreme Mixing Case A:
The CO₂ sinks (due to its density) to the bottom of container, displacing the air upwards with no mixing. So you get a growing layer of pure CO₂ at the bottom and a shrinking layer of air above it.

Extreme Mixing Case B:
Perfect mixing of air and CO₂ continually occurs. So the gas in the container is always a uniform mixture of CO₂ and air.

The reality will, of course, be somewhere between these 2 extremes. But It is very hard to say ‘where’ between the extremes. Because of this, ideally, the result would be obtained by experimental measurement of CO₂ concentration and not by calculation.

Also, it would be useful to know the purpose of this equipment – so that individuals considering answering are aware of any ethical issues.

If you haven’t yet read the forum rules, they are here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/homework-help-guidelines-for-students-and-helpers.686781/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Mahdivets said:
The gas distribution pattern is not relevant for our need, and any distribution pattern is fine.
You tagged this thread with a "Biology" label, which implies that you are conducting biology experiments with this chamber. And as @Steve4Physics mentions, this brings ethical issues into play. You need to share with us what the purpose of this setup is, so we can 1) give you the best technical advice we can, and 2) judge whether your experiments are taking into account current ethical standards.
 
That 3L/min: Is that before the CO2 enters the valve of after it exits? What is the pressure before and after the valve?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K