Calculating Heat Energy: Oxygen and Neon Gas Mixture (HELP)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the heat energy required to raise the temperature of a gas mixture consisting of 1.00g of oxygen and 1.00g of neon from 298K to 398K. Participants clarify the application of the equipartition theorem and the formulas for internal energy (ΔU) and enthalpy (ΔH) under constant volume and constant pressure conditions. The correct heat capacities for oxygen (Cv=5/2R) and neon (Cv=3/2R) are emphasized, leading to calculated values of qv = 3325.6 J and qp = 3525.79 J for the respective conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the equipartition theorem
  • Knowledge of heat capacity formulas (Cv and Cp)
  • Familiarity with the concepts of internal energy (ΔU) and enthalpy (ΔH)
  • Basic principles of gas behavior and degrees of freedom
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equipartition theorem in detail
  • Learn about the derivation and application of heat capacity formulas for different gas types
  • Explore the relationship between internal energy and enthalpy in thermodynamics
  • Investigate the degrees of freedom for various molecular structures
USEFUL FOR

Students studying thermodynamics, chemistry enthusiasts, and professionals involved in gas behavior analysis will benefit from this discussion.

chocolatepie
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Calculating Heat Energy (HELP)

Homework Statement


A mixture consisting of 1.00g oxygen gas and 1.00g neon gas is trapped within a 1.0L container at an initial temperature of 298K. Calculate the heat energy required to increase the temperature of this mixture to 398K
(a) at a constant volume of 1.0L
(b) under conditions where the container is allowed to expand against a constant pressure pext. The pressure pext is equal to the initial pressure of the mixture at 298K.
* note: base your calculations on the equipartition theorem. (do not tabulate heat capacity values)

Homework Equations



C=q/ΔT
Um(T)=3/2RT (*)

The Attempt at a Solution


(a) ΔU = qv when volume is constant
When using equipartition theorem (*), what should I put for temperature?

(b) ΔH = qp when pressure is constant.
Should I use formula H = U + pV to calculate ΔH?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi chocolatepie! :smile:

I'm not really sure what is intended by the equipartition theorem.
Can you enlighten me?

I think you're supposed to use Q = Cv ΔT for constant volume and Q = Cp ΔT for constant pressure.

I guess you can use Um(T)=3/2RT for Neon, or rather Cv=3/2R and Cp=5/2R.
But I suspect you should use a different formula for Oxygen since it is diatomic (Cv=5/2R and Cp=7/2R).
And anyway, to use this, you would need to convert your masses to moles.
 
Ok, so becuase O2 is diatomic, I am going to use Um(T) = 6/2RT = 3RT

I don't understand why Um(T) became Q? (is Q heat? meaning q?)
 
chocolatepie said:
Ok, so becuase O2 is diatomic, I am going to use Um(T) = 6/2RT = 3RT

Errr... no.
Could you check your notes?

Um(T)=Cv T.
Cv depends on the type of molecule.
It is Cv=f/2 R where f is the number of degrees of freedom (max 3 translational and max 3 rotational).
chocolatepie said:
I don't understand why Um(T) became Q? (is Q heat? meaning q?)

Oh sorry, I always try to use the symbols from the OP, but I am used to Q myself instead of q.
I think that in your case they mean the same thing.
(Actually, I'm used to using a capital Q when referring to a mol, and a lowercase q when referring to a kg, but it seems you do not make that distinction.)
 
I like Serena said:
Errr... no.
Could you check your notes?

Um(T)=Cv T.
Cv depends on the type of molecule.
It is Cv=f/2 R where f is the number of degrees of freedom (max 3 translational and max 3 rotational).




Oh sorry, I always try to use the symbols from the OP, but I am used to Q myself instead of q.
I think that in your case they mean the same thing.
(Actually, I'm used to using a capital Q when referring to a mol, and a lowercase q when referring to a kg, but it seems you do not make that distinction.)


My note says that Um(T)=(x/2)RT
Don't we write C for heat capacity? so does it mean x/2 is a heat capacity?


So far, I did the following:
because V= const, ΔU = qv (v meant to remind that it was at constant V)
ΔUm(T) = 6/2RΔT = 3RΔT = 2494.2 J for oxygen
ΔUm(T) = 3RΔT = 1247.1J for Ne

To calculate heat energy required, should I add these ΔUm(T) to use ΔH=ΔU +pΔV (where pΔV is gone because ΔV is 0)?
 
Last edited:
chocolatepie said:
My note says that Um(T)=(x/2)RT
Don't we write C for heat capacity? so does it mean x/2 is a heat capacity?


So far, I did the following:
because V= const, ΔU = qv (v meant to remind that it was at constant V)
ΔUm(T) = 6/2RΔT = 3RΔT = 2494.2 J for oxygen
ΔUm(T) = 3RΔT = 1247.1J for Ne

To calculate heat energy required, should I add these ΔUm(T) to use ΔH=ΔU +pΔV (where pΔV is gone because ΔV is 0)?

Yes, we write C for heat capacity (for 1 mol).
More specifically, we write Cv for the heat capacity at constant volume, and Cp for the heat capacity at constant pressure.
Furthermore the heat capacity is Cv = (x/2)R.
(You need to include the R.)

For an ideal gas Um(T)=Cv ΔT.
The value of Cv depends on the type of gas.
We distinguish 3 varieties: monatomic (like Neon), diatomic (like Oxygen), and more complex molecules that extend in 3 dimensions (like NH3).
Each has a different Cv.
 
Could you check my math in my previous post?
 
Doesn't oxygen have 6 degrees of freedom and Ne has 3?
 
  • #10
To calculate heat energy required, should I add these ΔUm(T) to use ΔH=ΔU +pΔV (where pΔV is gone because ΔV is 0)?
 
  • #11
chocolatepie said:
Doesn't oxygen have 6 degrees of freedom and Ne has 3?

No, oxygen has 5 degrees of freedom.

And yes, Ne has 3 degrees, but you did not substitute this value correctly for x.


chocolatepie said:
To calculate heat energy required, should I add these ΔUm(T) to use ΔH=ΔU +pΔV (where pΔV is gone because ΔV is 0)?

Not quite.

You have the energy of a mol, but you need the energy of a gram of each.

Furthermore, the question asks for the heat required at constant volume.
That is qv.
You already had a formula for that.
What was it?
 
  • #12
Could you explain why it is 5?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
At constant V, I had a formula ΔU = qv

Does it mean I need to add ΔU for each gas since they are in a mixture?

Also, I am using ΔU +PΔV =q for the part (b). There is no work value given.. and so is pressure
 
Last edited:
  • #14
chocolatepie said:
Could you explain why it is 5?

Each molecule has 3 translational degrees of freedom.
The rotational degrees of freedom is what this is about.

If you have a complex molecule like NH3, there are 3 rotational axes to which the molecule will resist movement so to speak.
This gives a total of 6 degrees of freedom.

With a diatomic molecule, the atoms are lined up on an axis.
If you try to rotate it, there is 1 axis to which it will not "resist" movement (the axis along the atoms).
And there are 2 axes to which it will "resist" movement.
So a diatomic molecule has 3+2=5 degrees of freedom.

A monatomic molecule does not "resist" any rotation, so it only has the 3 translational degrees of freedom.You can find it for instance here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_gas#Heat_capacity
(But not so detailed I'm afraid. o:))
 
Last edited:
  • #15
chocolatepie said:
At constant V, I had a formula ΔU = qv

Does it mean I need to add ΔU for each gas since they are in a mixture?

Yes.

The total internal energy is the sum of the internal energy of each of the components.


chocolatepie said:
Also, I am using ΔU +PΔV =q for the part (b). There is no work value given.. and so is pressure

Yes, you can use that.
 
  • #16
Now I have:
(a) qv = 3325.6J
(b) qp = 3525.79J

?!
 
  • #17
chocolatepie said:
Now I have:
(a) qv = 3325.6J
(b) qp = 3525.79J

?!

I get something different.
How did you calculate it?

Did you take into account that you have 1 gram of each component and not 1 mole?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K