Calculating Initial Speed from 2D Kinematics Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the initial speed of a stone thrown horizontally from a height of 6.02 meters, which lands 13.90 meters away. The correct approach involves using the kinematic equations for projectile motion, specifically equation 3 to find the time of flight, resulting in t = 1.23 seconds. The horizontal distance is then calculated using equation 2, leading to an initial speed of 11.3 m/s. However, the participant initially miscalculated the time due to neglecting to take the square root of the final value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 2D kinematics
  • Familiarity with projectile motion equations
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration (g)
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of kinematic equations for projectile motion
  • Practice solving similar 2D kinematics problems
  • Learn about the effects of air resistance on projectile motion
  • Explore advanced topics in physics such as vector decomposition
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in mastering projectile motion calculations.

brushman
Messages
112
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A stone thrown horizontally from a height of 6.02m hits the ground at a distance of 13.90m. Calculate the initial speed of the stone. Neglect air resistance.


Homework Equations


1. v = v0 + at
2. x = x0 + (1/2)(v0+v)t
3. x = x0 + v0t + (1/2)at^2
4. v^2 = v0^2 + 2a(x-x0)


The Attempt at a Solution


First I solved for t using the y components of equation 3. So
0 = x0y + (1/2)at^2;
a = -g;
x0y = 6.02;

so t = 1.23s

Then using x components of equation 2 I said
v0x = vx;
13.9 = v(1.23);
so v = 11.3 m/s

but that's not the right answer.

Sorry this isn't more clear, I'm in a hurry. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brushman said:
First I solved for t using the y components of equation 3. So
0 = x0y + (1/2)at^2;
a = -g;
x0y = 6.02;

so t = 1.23s
I don't think this part is right. Double check your calculations. (And don't forget to take the square root before arriving at your final value for t. :wink:)
 
omg, I swear I went over this problem 100 times and didn't catch that. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K