Calculating Initial Speed: Solving for Vi in Projectile Motion

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the initial speed of a ball thrown upwards, reaching a height of 80.6 meters in 5.1 seconds, with gravity's acceleration at 9.8 m/s². Participants explore various kinematic equations, ultimately identifying that the correct formula to use is D = Vi*t + 1/2*a*t². There is confusion about the application of the equation, particularly regarding the correct treatment of gravity and time in the calculations. After clarifying the formula, the initial speed is determined to be approximately 40.794 m/s. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying kinematic equations to solve projectile motion problems.
anglum
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Calculating Initial speed?

Homework Statement



A ball is thrown straight up at ground level passes a height of 80.6m in 5.1s.
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8m/s squared. What was its initial speed? answer in units of m/s


Homework Equations



What equation is the correct one to use to calculate this

The Attempt at a Solution




I tried using the formula tup=viy/g

and i also tried doing it as a table... where i calculated the velocity at 5.1 secs to be 15.804 m/s... by dividing 80.6 by 5.1 seconds...

then by adding( since if i was going ahead in seconds instead of back) 9.8 to that speed at 4.1 secs and gettin 25.604 m/s since
and goin up thru till 0 seconds... to get velocity of 65.784

please help me get thru this... this is my last problem for the weekend
 
Physics news on Phys.org
80.6 is not the maximum height. There's a kinematics equation you can use directly and solve for v1. Think about the equations you have at your disposal.
 
i know 80.6 is not the maximum height but I am guessin i cannto use the subtracting gravity from speed... so there is just one kinematics equation that i can use and plug in the data i have that will help me solve this
 
anglum said:
i know 80.6 is not the maximum height but I am guessin i cannto use the subtracting gravity from speed... so there is just one kinematics equation that i can use and plug in the data i have that will help me solve this

What is the equation you can use?
 
im not sure what equation i can use which i would plug in the 5.1 seconds and the 80.6m as well as the acceleration of gravity to get my initial speed... tehre is one that i can put all 3 into?
 
anglum said:
im not sure what equation i can use which i would plug in the 5.1 seconds and the 80.6m as well as the acceleration of gravity to get my initial speed... tehre is one that i can put all 3 into?

Yup there is. what are your displacement formulas?
 
what displacement formula let's me take into account gravity
 
so would the formula be

Vf=Vi + at

where i solve for Vf as 80.6/5.1? and plug the gravity into the equation for the value of A?
 
anglum said:
so would the formula be

Vf=Vi + at

where i solve for Vf as 80.6/5.1? and plug the gravity into the equation for the value of A?

No it's a formula that has d... displacement
 
  • #10
would it be... Vf squared = Vi squared + 2 A D

where Vf is equal to 80.6/5.1

A = -9.8m/s

D = 80.6 m

?
 
  • #11
anglum said:
would it be... Vf squared = Vi squared + 2 A D

where Vf is equal to 80.6/5.1

A = -9.8m/s

D = 80.6 m

?

Not that equation. The equation has vi, d, t and a. No vf.
 
  • #12
damn i thought that was the it...

ok so my only other equation that i think is

D = (Vi t) + 1/2 a t squared

so D would = 80.6

a would equal -9.8

would both the t equal 5.1?

then solve for Vi to get the initial speed?
 
  • #13
anglum said:
damn i thought that was the it...

ok so my only other equation that i think is

D = (Vi t) + 1/2 a t squared

so D would = 80.6

a would equal -9.8

would both the t equal 5.1?

then solve for Vi to get the initial speed?

exactly.
 
  • #14
ok however... if i solve for that i get the initial velocity to be negative?

that doesn't make sense
 
  • #15
i get 80.6 = Vi(5.1) + 1/2(-9.8 * 5.1) squared

then i get

80.6 = Vi(5.1) + 1/2(-49.980) squared
80.6=Vi(5.1) + 1/2(2498.00)
80.6=Vi(5.1) + 1249
-1168.400 = Vi(5.1)
-229.098 = Vi

that does not seem right to me
 
  • #16
anglum said:
i get 80.6 = Vi(5.1) + 1/2(-9.8 * 5.1) squared

then i get

80.6 = Vi(5.1) + 1/2(-49.980) squared
80.6=Vi(5.1) + 1/2(2498.00)
80.6=Vi(5.1) + 1249
-1168.400 = Vi(5.1)
-229.098 = Vi

that does not seem right to me

It should be:
\frac{1}{2}gt^2

not
\frac{1}{2}(gt)^2

only t is squared. not g.
 
  • #17
or do i only square the time and nto the acceleration of gravity?
 
  • #18
o sorry u posted faster that i typed that question


so is it (1/2g)(t squared)?
 
  • #19
anglum said:
o sorry u posted faster that i typed that question


so is it (1/2g)(t squared)?

yup.
 
  • #20
so would the initial speed be equal to 40.794m/s in this particular problem
 
  • #21
anglum said:
so would the initial speed be equal to 40.794m/s in this particular problem

exactly.
 
  • #22
thank you very much i appreciate you takin the time to help me
 
  • #23
anglum said:
so would the initial speed be equal to 40.794m/s in this particular problem
that's what i got.

y=y_0+v_{0y}t+\frac{1}{2}gt^2

v_{0y}=\frac{y-y_0-\frac{1}{2}gt^2}{t}
 
Last edited:
  • #24
You said "D = (Vi t) + 1/2 a t squared"

That does NOT give you "80.6 = Vi(5.1) + 1/2(-9.8 * 5.1) squared"

Do you see the difference?
D= vit+ (1/2)a t2

not "D= vit+ (1/2)(at)2"!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K