Projectile motion, finding initial speed

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 7K views
vizakenjack
Messages
57
Reaction score
4
An object fired at an angle of 30° above the horizontal takes 2.5 s to travel the last 12 m of its vertical distance and the last 10 m of its horizontal distance. With what speed was the object launched? (Note: This problem does not stipulate that the initial and final elevation of the object has to be the same!)

Solution:
First, an initial velocity in x direction (air friction is ignored, I guess, so velocity in x direction stays the same) is to be found.

The object traveled in x direction - 10 meters.
And the formula for horizontal distance is: d = vt
10 = v*2.5s
v = 4m/s
that's the x component of velocity (Vx)

Knowing initial Vx and an angle, we can find the y component of the velocity (Vy)
Tangent is opposite/adjacent. We need to find opposite, which corresponds to Vy.
so: tan(30°) * Vx (adjacent) = Vy
Vy = 2.309 m/s

Now the initial velocity needs to be found. Using Pythagoras theorem: sqrt(4^2 m/s + 2.309^2 m/s) =
4.618602 m/s

The answer is: 4.618602 m/s

But my question is, why doesn't the solution work if instead of finding initial horizontal velocity, initial vertical velocity is to be found first?
See for yourself:
So I see 12 meters is the max height reached by an object, right?
Formula for height in projectile motion is: h = V2y/2g -> 12=V2y/2g
Vy = 15.3362 m/s
It's already wrong!
Why??

I'm also kinda confused whether I should use this formula:
d = V*t + 1/2 * gt2
Anyway, using that kinematic equation yields: 17.05 m/s for Vy
Which is also wrong...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org

I'm not sure, but it seems to me that you are finding the initial velocity in the x direction for a situation where the total horizontal distance is 10. Is that what the problem is asking? It seems to me that the horizontal distance is unknown and you only know the time for the last 10 meters.
 
The problem gives distance in both y and x direction.
However, the problem is solvable if you first find the Vx.

Why can't I solve it finding Vy first and then solving for Vx and Velocity?
 
The first equation can't be used because it uses the initial velocity to or maximum height to solve it. You have neither those things (hence the note in the problem). The second equation requires knowledge of the initial position in the y direction. Which you also don't have. The values you're given don't qualify.
 
Cake said:
The first equation can't be used because it uses the initial velocity to or maximum height to solve it. You have neither those things (hence the note in the problem).don't qualify.
Isn't the "12 m of its vertical distance" = max height reached by an object?

Cake said:
The second equation requires knowledge of the initial position in the y direction. Which you also don't have. The values you're given
Wouldn't the initial y position be 0? Or why can't I assume it's 0?
 
vizakenjack said:
Isn't the "12 m of its vertical distance" = max height reached by an object?Wouldn't the initial y position be 0? Or why can't I assume it's 0?
1. No. It doesn't say in the problem that is the max height.
2. No, it tells you this in the note in the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vizakenjack