Calculating Intensity of Unpolarized Light with Polarizers

  • Thread starter Thread starter hardwork
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the intensity of unpolarized light as it passes through two polarizers. The original poster presents a scenario where unpolarized light with an initial intensity of 100 W/m² is subjected to a polarizer at an angle of 18 degrees, and seeks to determine the emerging intensity. The second part of the problem involves finding the angle of a second polarizer given the intensity of light that emerges from it.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of Malus's law to determine the intensity after passing through polarizers. There is uncertainty about the correct initial intensity to use for the second polarizer and how to apply the formula for the angle.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the calculations, with some suggesting the use of Malus's law and others questioning the assumptions regarding the intensity values. There is an ongoing exploration of the angle for the second polarizer, with various calculations being proposed but no clear consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the application of formulas and the correct values to use, indicating a need for clarification on the assumptions made in the problem setup.

hardwork
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
PART 1: Unpolarized light has an intensity of 100 W/m^2. It passes though a polarizer whose transmission axis is rotated 18 degrees with respect to the vertical. What is the intensity of the light that emerges from the polarizer?

I = (1/2)(Io)(cos angle)^2
I = (1/2)(100 W/m^2)(cos 18)^2
I = 45 W/m^2 -- I am not sure if this is correct.

PART 2: This light passes through a second polarizer and the intensity of the light that emerges is 40 W/m^2. What angel does the transmission axis of the second polarizer make with the vertical?

I don't understand this part. Would I use the same equation above and plug in 40 W/m^2 for I, 100 W/m^2 for Io, and solve for cos?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PART 1: From a polarizer 50% of light will be transmitted irrespective of the orientation of the transmission axis.
For part 2, use Malus's law.
 
Thank you!
For PART 1, would it just be I = (1/2)(100 W/m^2) then? So, I = 50 W/m^2 ?
I still don't understand PART 2. What do I plug into Malus' Law?
 
I = Imax*cos^2(theta)
 
Part 1 is okay then? The answer is 50?

Part 2: 40 W/m^2 = 100 W/m^2 cos^2(theta)
and then solve for cos?
 
hardwork said:
Part 1 is okay then? The answer is 50?

Part 2: 40 W/m^2 = 100 W/m^2 cos^2(theta)
and then solve for cos?
No.
For second polarizer Imax is 50 w/m^2
 
Oh! Thank you so much for helping me. I'm sorry I'm a little confused.
Would the answer be 27 degrees?

I am not sure if I solved for the angle correctly. I'm forgetting my math skills here. haha
 
Part 2: 40 W/m^2 = 50 W/m^2 cos^2(theta)
cos^2(theta) = 0.8
Find cos theta. Add 18 degrees to this angle to get the result.
 
cos^2(theta) = 0.8
then take the sqrt of both sides?
cos(theta) = 0.9
cos-1(theta) = 26 degrees

Angle: 26 + 18 = 44 degrees ... I hope. :redface:
 
  • #10
Yes. Correct. You can take 26.6 as well.
 
  • #11
That was very helpful. Thanks, again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K