Calculating Kinetic Energy in Alpha Decay: Thorium to Radon Nucleus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the kinetic energy during the alpha decay of a 232 Th (thorium) nucleus to a 228 Ra (radon) nucleus, with a total kinetic energy of 6.54 x 10^-13 J. The user correctly applies the conservation of momentum principle, leading to the equations for the kinetic energies of both the recoiling 228 Ra nucleus and the emitted alpha particle. The calculated velocities and kinetic energies are confirmed, with the 228 Ra nucleus having a kinetic energy of 1.13 x 10^-14 J and the alpha particle having a kinetic energy of 6.43 x 10^-13 J. The user also discusses formatting suggestions for clarity in future posts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of alpha decay and nuclear reactions
  • Knowledge of conservation of momentum principles
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy calculations
  • Basic grasp of mass-energy equivalence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of alpha decay in nuclear physics
  • Learn about conservation of momentum in particle physics
  • Explore advanced kinetic energy calculations in nuclear reactions
  • Investigate the properties and behavior of alpha particles
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in nuclear physics, physicists working with particle decay, and anyone interested in the calculations related to kinetic energy in nuclear reactions.

Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
A 232 Th (thorium) nucleus at rest decays to a 228 Ra (radon) nucleus with the emission of an alpha particle. The total kinetic energy of the decay fragments is 6.54 x 10^-13 J. An alpha particle has 1.76% of the mass of a 228 Ra nucleus.

a) Calculate the kinetic energy of the recoiling 228 Ra nucleus.

b) Calculate the kinetic energy of the alpha particle.


Please check to see if my setup is correct. If it is not, kindly tell me which setup(s) I am supposed to use.

I know Conservation of Momentum is involved in this explosion.

Momentum is 0 since Th nucleus is at rest before alpha decay.

Therefore, m_alpha*v_alpha = -m_Ra*v_Ra, so .0176*m_Ra*v_alpha = -m_Ra*v_Ra.

m_Ra cancels:

.0176*v_alpha = -v_Ra

From kinetic energy,

KE = (0.5)*m_Ra*(v_Ra)^2 + (0.5)*0.0176*m_Ra*(v_alpha)^2, where KE = is 6.54 x 10^-13 J Is this right?

v_alpha = (-v_Ra)/.0176

Substitue this in KE formula.

KE = (0.5)*m_Ra*(v_Ra)^2 + (0.5)*0.0176*m_Ra*[(-v_Ra)/.0176)]^2

KE = (0.5)*m_Ra*(v_Ra)^2 + (0.5)*m_Ra*(v_Ra)^2*(1/.0176)

Now I used mass_Radon nucleus = 3.6*10^-25 kg to solve for v_Ra, but this is not given. Are the masses supposed to cancel?

Solving for v_Ra,

v_Ra = sqrt[(3.633*10^12)/57.81818)] = 250680.3047 m/s

Individual KE:

KE_Ra = (3.6*10^-25 kg)*(250680.3047 m/s)^2*0.5 = 1.13*10^-14 J

KE_alpha = (3.6*10^-25 kg)*(-250680.3047 m/s)^2*0.5*(1/.0176) = 6.43*10^-13 J

I would appreciate any help.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It was a bit tough to read through, but it looked right through when you solved for the velocity.

A nice way to make things look a lot neater, instead of writing KE_alpha, writing KEalpha doesn't even require using latex, you just use [.sub] and [./sub] tags without the '.' You can also do the same thing with [.sup] and [./sup] to get super scripts, like this: v1/2
 
Thanks. I will try to use the tags in my future posts.

Was it correct of me to use mass_Radon nucleus = 3.6*10^-25 kg even though it was not given?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
15K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K