Calculating Kp of o2 and o3 equilibrium

  • Context: Chemistry 
  • Thread starter Thread starter i_love_science
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the equilibrium constant Kp for the reaction involving oxygen (O2) and ozone (O3). Participants explore the relationships between molar mass, mole fractions, and concentrations, while addressing errors in calculations and assumptions related to the definitions of mole and mass fractions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a calculation for Kp using a weighted average molar mass approach, leading to a derived value of 0.550.
  • Another participant points out that the mole fractions calculated do not sum to 1.0, suggesting a correction to the mole fraction of ozone and providing new partial pressures for both gases.
  • A third participant emphasizes the distinction between mole fraction and mass fraction, correcting the molar mass equation and critiquing the use of shorthand notation for chemical symbols.
  • One participant acknowledges the criticism while expressing appreciation for the constructive feedback, indicating a willingness to learn from the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculations and definitions used, with no consensus reached on the correct value of Kp or the proper approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the definitions of mole and mass fractions, as well as potential errors in the initial calculations that have not been fully clarified.

i_love_science
Messages
80
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Consider the reaction 3 O2(g) --> 2 O3(g).
At 175°C and a pressure of 128 torr, an equilibrium mixture of O2 and O3 has a density of 0.168 g/L. Calculate Kp for the above reaction at 175°C.
Relevant Equations
PV = nRT
My solution:

PV = nRT
M = dRT / P
M is the weighted average molar mass of o2 and o3 --> M = 32x + 16(1-x), where x is the % by mass of o2 and 1-x is the % by mass of o3.

M = 32x + 16(1-x) = (0.168 g/L) (62.36 L*torr/mol*K) (448 K) / (128 torr) = 36.668 g/mol
solving the equation gives x = 0.708, 1-x = 0.282

Concentration of o2: 0.708 * 0.168 g/L * 1 mol / 32 g = 0.00372 mol/L
Concentration of o3: 0.282 * 0.168 g/L * 1 mol/48 g = 0.00102 mol/L

Kc = (0.00102 mol/L)^3 / (0.00372 mol/L)^2
Kp = Kc / (RT)^(delta n) = (0.00102 mol/L)^3 / (0.00372 mol/L)^2 / (0.08206 L*mol/atm*K)^(-1) = 0.550

My answer was wrong, the correct answer is 1.5. Could anyone explain where I went wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your mole fractions don't add up to 1.0. I get 0.708 for the mole fraction of oxygen, but 0.292 for the mole fraction of ozone. So, the partial pressure of oxygen is then 0.1192 atm, and the partial pressure of ozone is then 0.0492 atm. What does this give you for Kp?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: i_love_science
Do note that x is mole fraction, not mass fraction (and certainly not % mass). And your equation should be
M = 32x + 48(1-x)
(I think you just made a typo, you seem to have calculated x correctly.)
And you've been doing this long enough to know that dioxygen is O2, not o2. If you think o2 is acceptable shorthand - it isn't! It makes you look like someone who isn't taking it seriously. It's of a piece with your little errors in calculation. Science is about taking the trouble to get things correct, not rushing and cutting corners and making silly mistakes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: i_love_science, jim mcnamara and Chestermiller
@i_love_science, kudos for liking my post although it criticised you. That's the sign of someone who wants to learn!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K