Calculating Lawn Mower Acceleration and Force: A Physics Perspective

  • Thread starter Thread starter Larrytsai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the force required to accelerate a lawn mower from rest to a specified speed, considering the effects of retarding forces and the angle of the handle. The subject area includes dynamics and forces, particularly focusing on Newton's laws of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between applied force, retarding force, and net force. Questions arise about the calculations of forces and the implications of pushing at a constant speed.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about forces and clarifying calculations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between applied and retarding forces, and the importance of including all relevant details in the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a 45º angle of the mower handle, which affects the calculation of the horizontal component of the applied force. Participants are also navigating discrepancies in force values and their implications for the overall problem.

Larrytsai
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
A person pushes a 16-kg with constant speed with a force of 80N directed along the handle. Calculate the force the person must exert on the lawn mower to accelerate it from rest to 1.5 m/s in 2.5 seconds (assuming the same retarding force).

k well so far i got the acceleration, which is 0.6m/s/s. I also got FN which is FN= F(y)+mg, but i don't know if that's important. My retarding force is 56.6N does that mean my F(push)= Fretarding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


How did you find all these values? Can you show your work?
 


Let's go back to the first part. When you are pushing the lawn mower at constant speed, what is the net force on it? Why would the speed be constant if you are applying an 80-N force to it? What does this tell you about the retarding force? (We will use this same retarding force for the main question.)
 


dynamicsolo said:
Let's go back to the first part. When you are pushing the lawn mower at constant speed, what is the net force on it? Why would the speed be constant if you are applying an 80-N force to it? What does this tell you about the retarding force? (We will use this same retarding force for the main question.)

Wouldn't the Net force = to 0 since acceleration = 0?, and the speed would be constant if you are applying 80 - N force because the retarding force = 80N i think >.<
 


All right! Now you have found the acceleration for the lawn mower for the main question. What must the net force on it be this time? If the retarding force is unchanged, what force must you apply to it to obtain that net force?
 


dynamicsolo said:
All right! Now you have found the acceleration for the lawn mower for the main question. What must the net force on it be this time? If the retarding force is unchanged, what force must you apply to it to obtain that net force?

Well, my accerlation rate is 0.6m/s/s so i went Fnet=ma and got (16)(0.6)= 9.6N +56.6N
which is the retarding force

so basically my equation looks like this : Fnet = ma + F(retarding)
 


I thought you found that the retarding force is 80 N?

Consider it this way. Your applied force is being treated as if it is entirely in the forward direction. The retarding force points backwards. So the net force will be

F_net = F_applied - F_retarding = ma .

Your result for the net force is correct, so F_applied = ?
 


dynamicsolo said:
I thought you found that the retarding force is 80 N?

Consider it this way. Your applied force is being treated as if it is entirely in the forward direction. The retarding force points backwards. So the net force will be

F_net = F_applied - F_retarding = ma .

Your result for the net force is correct, so F_applied = ?

Hmm, so this is what i would get

9.6 = F_applied - 56.6 = ma?

whats confusing me is the "=ma" part
 


Back in post #6, you yourself calculated the net force on the mower as F_net = ma = (16 kg)·(0.6 m/(sec^2)) = 9.6 N. Then you said in post #4 that the retarding force is 80 N. (Where are you getting 56.6 N from?)
 
  • #10


dynamicsolo said:
Back in post #6, you yourself calculated the net force on the mower as F_net = ma = (16 kg)·(0.6 m/(sec^2)) = 9.6 N. Then you said in post #4 that the retarding force is 80 N. (Where are you getting 56.6 N from?)

56.6N came from my horizontal component (Cos 45)(80)
 
  • #11


Larrytsai said:
56.6N came from my horizontal component (Cos 45)(80)

Oh, I was wondering about that "force along the handle"... There's no mention in your original post of the 45º angle of the mover handle. (That's kind of an important detail. This is why the helpers on this Forum ask you to show your calculation up front...)

All right, so the horizontal component of the applied force is 56.6 N forward, so the horizontal retarding force is 56.6 N backward. The net force is F_net = ma = 9.6 N forward, so the equation you had in post #8 is correct:

9.6 N = F_applied - 56.6 N .
 
  • #12


dynamicsolo said:
Oh, I was wondering about that "force along the handle"... There's no mention in your original post of the 45º angle of the mover handle. (That's kind of an important detail.)

All right, so the horizontal component of the applied force is 56.6 N forward, so the horizontal retarding force is 56.6 N backward. The net force is F_net = ma = 9.6 N forward, so the equation you had in post #8 is correct:

9.6 N = F_applied - 56.6 N .

K well i hope this is correct, cause the book saids its 94 N.
 
  • #13


OK, right, now that we have the 45º involved in this, the horizontal component of the applied force is 9.6 + 56.6 N = 66.2 N.

So this now means that

(F_applied)·(cos 45º) = 66.2 N .

That should do it.

(Please be careful in future not to leave out details of a problem. Sometimes they matter a lot.)
 
  • #14


Alright, I finally reached the answer, using pythag thnx a lot for the help, this question has been puzzling me since 6pm today >.< I finally feel relived. Once again thnx a bunch
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
21K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K