Calculating Mass of a Slug: Using Centigram Balance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Partisan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balance Mass
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass of a slug using a centigram balance, the mass of the beaker and the mass of the beaker with the slug should be measured. The mass of the slug can be determined by subtracting the mass of the beaker from the combined mass of the beaker and slug. The calculations provided indicate that the mass of the slug is 2.42g, which is derived from the measurements given. The discussion clarifies that the method of subtracting is correct and confirms the simplicity of the process. Understanding this method reassures users that they are on the right track with their calculations.
Partisan
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I do online schooling or I'd just ask a teacher anywho I need to find the calculated mass of a slug by difference, I'm using centigram balance to calculate everything.
This is what I know so far:
Snug w/ beaker: 52.42g
Snug: 2.42
Beaker: 50g

I don't know if I should divide or subtract them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand your question. But calculating mass by difference will mean subtract. which it seems you have already done.
 
dacruick said:
I'm not sure I understand your question. But calculating mass by difference will mean subtract. which it seems you have already done.

That's what I'm thinking to but if its suppose to be the answer for a question the answer seems inadequate
 
what exactly are you trying to find? The weight of this "snug"?
 
Here's the whole question
Use the other centigram balance to determine the slug mass by difference:
Mass of beaker:_____
Mass of beaker and slug:______
Calculated mass of the slug by difference:_______

This is using a centigram balance
 
Last edited:
you've done everything right if that's the case. If you measure the mass of the beaker, and you measure the mass of the beaker and the slug you will have Slug + Beaker - Beaker = Slug
 
Alright thanks I understand it I guess I was thinking it'd be longer or more complex than what it was :) So I guess I needed to double check, thanks for your help.
 
no problem:)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Back
Top