Calculating Maximum Speed of a Child on a Swing

  • Thread starter Thread starter pinkyjoshi65
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum speed of a child on a swing, modeled as a pendulum. The problem involves energy transformations, specifically the conversion between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy, as the child swings to different heights.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy principles, questioning how to determine the height of the center of mass and the correct application of energy equations. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between potential and kinetic energy at different positions of the swing.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the energy conservation equations. Some have provided guidance on using trigonometric relationships to find the height, while others are verifying calculations and discussing the significance of mass in the equations.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the height used in calculations and the role of mass in the energy equations. Participants are also referencing external resources for clarification on pendulum motion and energy transformations.

pinkyjoshi65
Messages
260
Reaction score
0
Energy transforations!

A student swings on a swing so that his centre of mass is located 2.2 m from the rest point where the rope is attached to the rail. If he swings so that his maximum amplitude causes the rope to make an angle of 49° with the vertical, calculate the child's maximum speed during the swing.


I don't know where to start!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok...i've got a slight idea..we have to take the motion of the spring as a pendulum..
 
use conservation of energy. gravitational potential energy... kinetic energy.
 
ok..soo at the equlibrium position, we use total energy=mgh where h is 2.2m, and at the new postition the total energy is 0.5mv^2 yes..?
 
pinkyjoshi65 said:
ok..soo at the equlibrium position, we use total energy=mgh where h is 2.2m, and at the new postition the total energy is 0.5mv^2 yes..?

almost there... 2.2m is not your h. 2.2m is the length of the rope (not exactly but it is the distance from the joint to the center of mass of the child)...

How high above the bottom does the child's center of mass reach? use 2.2m, 49 degrees and trig. that would be your h.
 
ok..so i use tan49= h/2.2, hence i can find h..but what abt the mass ??..and wait should'nt the energy at the equilibrium position be the kinetic energy, since h is 0..?
 
so when i take the total energy at the equilibrium position as the kinetic energy, and the total energy at the other position as the potential energy, and solve them, i got v as 7.04m/sec..is tht ok..?
 
ok..soo by doing that i got v as 3.86m/s
 
  • #10
pinkyjoshi65 said:
ok..soo by doing that i got v as 3.86m/s

looks good. I get 3.851m/s though... it's just the rounding.
 
  • #11
If [tex]l[/tex] is the length of the rope then, the height will be [tex]h = l(1 - \cos{\theta} )[/tex]
The velocity of the boy is then simply [tex]\sqrt{2gh}[/tex] at the equilibrium position. At equilibrium position the velocity of a pendulum is maximum, so that's what you're looking for.
You get the equation by using simple conservation laws. (That of the potential energy at the height and the kinetic energy at the bottom.
I know you've got the answer, but I'm just reiterating the facts so that it becomes clear why you do what you do.
Moreover try to use variables rather than direct numerical values, you'll miss the physics involved, and it might get complicated unnecessarily.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K