Calculating Motor Torque for a Rigid Belt Drive System with a Load in the Middle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hiro Kazayama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Belt Drive System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the torque required by a motor in a rigid belt drive system with a load positioned in the middle of the belt. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of torque calculation, considering factors such as inertia, acceleration, and efficiency.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to determine the torque required by the motor to move a load located in the middle of a rigid belt drive system.
  • Another participant inquires about calculating the mass moment of inertia of an object at a distance from the primary axis.
  • Some participants propose using the relationship F=ma and Torque=pulley = F x Diameter-pulley, emphasizing the need to account for inertia when accelerating the mass.
  • Others argue for a more comprehensive approach, suggesting the use of T=J*(Angular acceleration) and considering the effective inertial radius for quick calculations.
  • Participants discuss the importance of accounting for various factors, such as the rigidity of the belt, the height of the center of mass, and the need to include the inertia of the belt, motor, and pulleys in the calculations.
  • There is mention of complexities arising from gearing, friction, slip, and the geometry of the load affecting the inertia calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to calculate the required torque, with some advocating for simpler methods while others emphasize the need for a more detailed analysis that includes multiple factors. No consensus is reached on a single method or formula.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations such as the need for precise definitions of terms like inertia and the impact of various assumptions on the calculations. The discussion acknowledges that the complexity of the system can significantly affect the torque requirements.

Hiro Kazayama
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ok. Say you have a belt drive system that is run by a motor at one end. You have a load F located somewhere in the middle of the belt and the belt does not deflect (it is rigid).

How would I determine the torque required by the motor to move this load F?

Thanks in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Do you know how to calculate the mass moment of inertia of an object at a distance from the primary axis?
 
You must accelerate the mass.
F=ma.
Torque-pulley = F x Diameter-pulley.

You must also keep it moving, which is an inertia issue.
T=Jα

Then add all the other torques that you can account for. Size the motor for that, plus safety factor & efficiencies.
 
Well...It's more in depth than that leads one to think.

It all comes down to inertia and, as tygerdawg said, acceleration.

But you've got to consider them together, so instead of using m*a*D, as tygerdawg suggested, you should use T=J*(Angular accel).

So you have the following things to consider:
-- The belt is considered to be rigid, so if you assume that the belt/pulley system transfers torque with perfect efficiency (there's no losses from slip at the pulleys or stretch in the belt (and if there is, just add the efficiency factor in)), the mass is effectively acting on the motor pulley.
-- For masses that are relatively low in profile (that is, the COM isn't incredibly high above the belt) you can consider the effective inertial radius as the radius that of the pulley diameter for quick calculations.
-- If the mass has to be moved upward (i.e. at an incline) you have to account for that as well.

Inertia of a point mass (COM) at a distance from the primary axis is:
J(load) = m(load) * R(pulley)^2

m(load) is going to be:
W(load) / a(gravity)

Make sure you divide by the correct units for gravity. Inertia deals with masses, not forces. (which is why torque calculations are much easier on the brain in SI than in Imperial)

When you find your inertia, J(load), you can then multiply it by the angular acceleration:

(Angular accel) = (wi - wf) / (time)

Remember though, this will only be the torque required to accelerate the object. If you wanted to be more precise, you would add in the inertia of the belt (which can be approximated as m(belt)*R(pulley)^2), the inertia of the motor (as in the rotor inerta, which is found using the moment of inertia formula for a hollow cylinder), and the inertia of the pulleys, J(pulley)= .5 * m(pulley) * (Router^2 + Rinner^2).

Then you combine them all to get the total system inertia and multiply that by the angular acceleration to get your actual required torque.

There are other formulas for finding moments of inertia (using densities and what have you), and systems can get very complex. For instance, if you have any gearing, you have to translate the inertia through the gearing (which goes as a function of the ratio of the angular velocities squared), and if you are considering losses due to friction or slip or stretch, or if your object has a strange geometry that must be considered in the inertia calcs, or if it moves on the conveyor, etc. etc.

But this should give you a back of the envelope type of answer.
 
Very Nice Answer from Trans_king...(Even I had been facing problem about whether to considering total I or what)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K