Calculating Phase Space Volume for Canonical Ensemble

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating phase space volume in the context of the canonical ensemble, specifically addressing the partition function and its integration. It is established that the phase space volume is calculated by integrating exp[-B(H(q,p))] dqdp without dividing by Planck's constant (h). The necessity of dividing by h arises when transitioning from classical to quantum mechanics to account for uncertainty in phase space. The conversation also references problems from Pathria's textbook on statistical mechanics that illustrate the concept of coarse-graining.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of canonical and microcanonical ensembles in statistical mechanics
  • Familiarity with partition functions and their significance
  • Knowledge of classical and quantum mechanics principles
  • Experience with integration in multiple dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the partition function in canonical ensembles
  • Learn about coarse-graining techniques in statistical mechanics
  • Explore the differences between classical and quantum mechanical treatments of systems
  • Read Pathria's textbook on statistical mechanics for practical problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and quantum mechanics, will benefit from this discussion.

mkbh_10
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
In calculating entropy in micro canonical ensemble we use KlnW where W is the no. of accessible micro states to the system , now when we move on to canonical ensemble ,we calculate the partition function and from there derive the thermodynamics of the system , and divide it by factor of h to make it dimensionless , now if one is asked to calculate phase space volume , it means we calculate the partition function by integration of exp[B(H(q,p))] dqdp and not dividing this by h . Is this correct ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mkbh_10 said:
In calculating entropy in micro canonical ensemble we use KlnW where W is the no. of accessible micro states to the system , now when we move on to canonical ensemble ,we calculate the partition function and from there derive the thermodynamics of the system , and divide it by factor of h to make it dimensionless , now if one is asked to calculate phase space volume , it means we calculate the partition function by integration of exp[B(H(q,p))] dqdp and not dividing this by h . Is this correct ??

I think that's correct, except the exponential should have a negative sign.

I think you should remember that the whole reason for dividing by "h" is because you are calculating something classically and want it to work quantum mechanically (it's not just a dimension thing). There is no such thing as an integral over dqdp in quantum mechanics (except in the path integral formalism) as you can't know both the position and momentum at the same time. So you coarse grain the phase space by a box of size "h" and hope this uncertainty in phase space gives you the correct classical answer.

addendum:

there are some good problems in a textbook by Pathria on statistical mechanics that illustrates coarse-graining. a simple one is to solve the harmonic oscillator both classically (where you need to insert "h" by hand) and quantum mechanically (where "h" comes naturally) and compare the two results in the limit of high energy. another one involves solving a gas of particles subject to the condition that if you take a snapshot of the gas, they are all within a n-dimensional regular polyhedra - calculate this classically and compare it quantum mechanically and you'll see that they give more or less the same result.

if you have a good teacher she will go through coarse-graining in class as it's important to know when classical mechanics works and when you need quantum mechanics. unfortunately, I didn't have a good teacher, so I learned from those two problems.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K