Calculating potential energy of hydrogen atom

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the potential energy of a hydrogen atom, specifically focusing on the expectation values and uncertainties related to the electron and proton in a given quantum state. The state is defined by a specific wavefunction, and participants are exploring the implications of this in the context of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of expectation values for ##\left< \frac 1 r \right>## and ##\left< \frac 1 {r^2} \right>##, and how these relate to the potential energy. There is confusion regarding the uncertainty of the potential energy and whether it should be zero for a stationary state. Questions arise about the appropriateness of symbols used (E vs V) and the correctness of derived expressions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the use of symbols and the nature of the wavefunction in relation to the potential energy operator. Corrections to calculations have been suggested, and there appears to be a productive exchange of ideas regarding the uncertainty calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the definitions and assumptions related to the potential energy and total energy in the context of quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to stationary states and eigenstates.

Leechie
Messages
19
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Calculate ##\left< \frac 1 r \right>## and ##\left< \frac 1 {r^2} \right>## and the expectation value and uncertainty of the potential energy of the electron and proton for a hydrogen atom in the given state.

The given state is:
$$ \psi_{2,1,-1} \left( r,\theta,\phi \right) = \left( \frac 1 {64 \pi a^3_0} \right)^{1/2} \frac r {a_0} e^{-r/2a_0} \sin(\theta) e^{-i\phi}$$

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I've calculated the expectation values for ##\left< \frac 1 r \right>## and ## \left< \frac 1 {r^2} \right> ## which I think are right. The values I've got are:
$$ \left< \frac 1 r \right> = \frac 1 {4a_0} $$ $$ \left< \frac 1 {r^2} \right> = \frac 1 {12a^2_0} $$
The expectation for the potential energy I've got is:
$$ \left< E \right> = - \frac {e^2} {4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \left< \frac 1 r \right> = -\frac {e^2} {16 \pi \varepsilon_0 a_0 }$$
This is where I'm getting a bit confused. I'm trying to use ## \Delta E = \sqrt {\left< E^2 \right> - \left< E \right>^2 }## to find the uncertainty. I thought it should equal zero since the question relates to a stationary state but I'm getting:

For ##\left< E^2 \right>## I've got:
$$ \left< E^2 \right> = - \frac {e^4} {256 \pi^2 \varepsilon^2_0 a^2_0 } \left< \frac 1 {r^2} \right> = -\frac {e^4} {3072 \pi^2 \varepsilon^2_0 a^2_0 }$$
So for the uncertainty I've got:
$$\begin{align} \Delta E & = \sqrt {\left< E^2 \right> - \left< E \right>^2 } \nonumber \\ & = \sqrt {-\frac {e^4} {3072 \pi^2 \varepsilon^2_0 a^2_0 } - \left( -\frac {e^2} {16 \pi \varepsilon_0 a_0 } \right)^2 } \nonumber \\ & = \sqrt {-\frac {e^4} {3072 \pi^2 \varepsilon^2_0 a^2_0 } + \frac {e^4} {256 \pi^2 \varepsilon^2_0 a^2_0 } } \nonumber \\ & = \sqrt {-\frac 1 {3072} + \frac 1 {256} } \nonumber \\ & = \sqrt {\frac {11} {3072} } \end{align}$$
Can anyone help with this please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're working with the potential energy V, rather than the total energy E. So, it might be less confusing to use the symbol V rather than E.
This is where I'm getting a bit confused. I'm trying to use ## \Delta E = \sqrt {\left< E^2 \right> - \left< E \right>^2 }## to find the uncertainty. I thought it should equal zero since the question relates to a stationary state
The wavefunction is not an eigenstate of the potential energy operator ##V##. So, do you expect ##\Delta V## to be zero?
Leechie said:
For ##\left< E^2 \right>## I've got:
$$ \left< E^2 \right> = - \frac {e^4} {256 \pi^2 \varepsilon^2_0 a^2_0 } \left< \frac 1 {r^2} \right> $$
The factor of 256 in this expression does not look correct.
[Edit: Also, the overall dimensions of this expression are incorrect for the square of an energy.]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leechie
Thanks for your reply TSny.

You're right about changing the the symbol ##E## to ##V##. I think using ##E## instead of ##V## is what was confusing me when thinking about the uncertainty.

I think I seen where I've gone wrong with my value for ##\left< V^2 \right>##. I've corrected it to:
$$\left< V^2 \right> = \frac {e^4} {16 \pi^2 \varepsilon^2_0 } \left< \frac {1} {r^2} \right> = \frac {e^4} {192 \pi^2 \varepsilon^2_0 a^2_0 } $$
So my uncertainty equation now looks like:
$$\begin{align} \Delta V & = \sqrt {\left< V^2 \right> - \left< V \right>^2} \nonumber \\ & = \sqrt { \frac {e^4} {192 \pi^2 \varepsilon^2_0 a^2_0 } - \left( - \frac {e^2} {16 \pi \varepsilon_0 a_0 } \right)^2 } \nonumber \\ & = \sqrt { \frac {e^4} {192 \pi^2 \varepsilon^2_0 a^2_0 } - \frac {e^4} {256 \pi^2 \varepsilon^2_0 a^2_0 } } \nonumber \\ & = \frac {e^2} {\sqrt {768} \pi \varepsilon_0 a_0 } \nonumber \end{align}$$
Which I think looks better, would you agree?
 
Yes, that looks good to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leechie
Great. Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
785
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K