Calculating Power of a Pulse: Tips and Considerations

  • Thread starter Thread starter axawire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Pulse
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the power of a pulse in an electrical context, specifically considering the relationship between current, resistance, and energy over time. The original poster is exploring the implications of using the formula P=RI^2 for pulse power calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of power as an instantaneous concept and whether it applies to pulses. Questions arise about assuming constant current during a pulse and the integration of power over time to find energy. There are considerations of different pulse shapes and their impact on energy calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various perspectives on the assumptions involved in calculating power and energy for pulses. Some guidance on integrating power over time and the implications of different current profiles has been provided, but no consensus has been reached regarding the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the uncertainty regarding the exact shape of the pulse and its implications for calculations. There is also mention of specific conditions, such as the use of superconductors, which may affect the applicability of the discussed formulas.

axawire
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Im trying to calculate the power of a pulse. I know the duration of the pulse t in seconds and I know the peak current Ipeak in Amps. If need be I can also calculate the resistance R of the conductor. I know of P=RI^2 but am not sure if this holds for pulses.

Help/Tips/Suggestions

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given that power is an instantaneous concept, there's no need to involve time, and it doesn't matter if it is a pulse or a continuous current. Yes, the power is given by I^2.R.

But maybe you're wondering what is the ENERGY of the pulse ? Then you will have to integrate the power over time. Assuming a constant current during time T, the energy becomes then I^2.R.T.
 
Current is the rate of moving a bunch of charge down a wire... Would it be acceptable to assume that a pulse represents a constant current?

Perhaps you could consider a charge-time envelope, then integrate this over time, then work in charge-energy relationships to obtain a final form.
 
desA said:
Current is the rate of moving a bunch of charge down a wire... Would it be acceptable to assume that a pulse represents a constant current?

Depends. If it is a square-pulse generator feeding a resistor, why not ?
However, if it is some kind of discharge, it will certainly not be constant.

Perhaps you could consider a charge-time envelope, then integrate this over time, then work in charge-energy relationships to obtain a final form.

Well, you'd need to take the derivative of the charge-time curve to find back the current, SQUARE IT, and integrate it back over time.
 
vanesch said:
Well, you'd need to take the derivative of the charge-time curve to find back the current, SQUARE IT, and integrate it back over time.

You're finding the RMS value for current, I assume.

You could probably also perform a simple integral average of the current (charge-time envelope differentiated). Depends how you wanted to define the final energy form. :biggrin:
 
desA said:
You're finding the RMS value for current, I assume.

Well, yes. If you integrate the square of the root of the average of the square, you find, eh, the integral of the square.

You could probably also perform a simple integral average of the current (charge-time envelope differentiated). Depends how you wanted to define the final energy form. :biggrin:

The integral of the differentiated charge-time envelope is simply the difference between the initial and final value of the charge-time curve ; in other words, the total amount of charge displaced.
However, depending on how this is delivered to a resistance, the dissipated energy is different! In the case of a true delta-function, the dissipated energy is infinite. In the case of a square pulse, the energy is indeed <I>^2 R T. For an intermediate pulse form, the energy dissipated in the resistor will be higher than <I>^2 R T: it will be <I^2> R T.
Now, the difference, <I^2> - <I>^2 is nothing else but the variance of the current (that's why for a square pulse, both are equal: the current doesn't change and has variance 0 during the time it flows).
So with <I> alone, you can only estimate a lower bound on the dissipated energy and all variation will increase it.
 
Well... I do not know the exact form of the wave, but I am assuming its sinusoidal in shape (but on the positive part of the wave). Now can I actually use the RMS for current when its a pulse and not an alternating current?

Also I am not so sure about using P=R*I^2 as if I use a super conductor does this equation still apply?

My goal here is I have a rough idea of the shape of this pulse I need, but I am trying to get a ball park figure for how much energy a pulse generater would have to use to generate such pulses on a continuous basis.

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K