Calculating Power of a Pulse: Tips and Considerations

  • Thread starter Thread starter axawire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Pulse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the power and energy of a pulse using the formula P=RI^2, where P is power, R is resistance, and I is peak current. It is established that while power is instantaneous and does not require time consideration, energy can be calculated by integrating power over time, resulting in the formula E=I^2RT for constant current pulses. The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding the pulse shape, as variations in current affect energy dissipation, particularly when comparing square pulses to other forms. The RMS value of current is relevant for determining energy in non-continuous waveforms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical power formulas, specifically P=RI^2
  • Knowledge of energy calculations involving integration over time
  • Familiarity with pulse shapes and their impact on current
  • Concept of RMS (Root Mean Square) current for non-continuous waveforms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the integration of power over time for varying current waveforms
  • Study the differences in energy dissipation for square pulses versus sinusoidal pulses
  • Learn about RMS calculations for different pulse shapes
  • Explore the implications of using superconductors in power calculations
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, and anyone involved in pulse power generation or energy calculations in electrical systems.

axawire
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Im trying to calculate the power of a pulse. I know the duration of the pulse t in seconds and I know the peak current Ipeak in Amps. If need be I can also calculate the resistance R of the conductor. I know of P=RI^2 but am not sure if this holds for pulses.

Help/Tips/Suggestions

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given that power is an instantaneous concept, there's no need to involve time, and it doesn't matter if it is a pulse or a continuous current. Yes, the power is given by I^2.R.

But maybe you're wondering what is the ENERGY of the pulse ? Then you will have to integrate the power over time. Assuming a constant current during time T, the energy becomes then I^2.R.T.
 
Current is the rate of moving a bunch of charge down a wire... Would it be acceptable to assume that a pulse represents a constant current?

Perhaps you could consider a charge-time envelope, then integrate this over time, then work in charge-energy relationships to obtain a final form.
 
desA said:
Current is the rate of moving a bunch of charge down a wire... Would it be acceptable to assume that a pulse represents a constant current?

Depends. If it is a square-pulse generator feeding a resistor, why not ?
However, if it is some kind of discharge, it will certainly not be constant.

Perhaps you could consider a charge-time envelope, then integrate this over time, then work in charge-energy relationships to obtain a final form.

Well, you'd need to take the derivative of the charge-time curve to find back the current, SQUARE IT, and integrate it back over time.
 
vanesch said:
Well, you'd need to take the derivative of the charge-time curve to find back the current, SQUARE IT, and integrate it back over time.

You're finding the RMS value for current, I assume.

You could probably also perform a simple integral average of the current (charge-time envelope differentiated). Depends how you wanted to define the final energy form. :biggrin:
 
desA said:
You're finding the RMS value for current, I assume.

Well, yes. If you integrate the square of the root of the average of the square, you find, eh, the integral of the square.

You could probably also perform a simple integral average of the current (charge-time envelope differentiated). Depends how you wanted to define the final energy form. :biggrin:

The integral of the differentiated charge-time envelope is simply the difference between the initial and final value of the charge-time curve ; in other words, the total amount of charge displaced.
However, depending on how this is delivered to a resistance, the dissipated energy is different! In the case of a true delta-function, the dissipated energy is infinite. In the case of a square pulse, the energy is indeed <I>^2 R T. For an intermediate pulse form, the energy dissipated in the resistor will be higher than <I>^2 R T: it will be <I^2> R T.
Now, the difference, <I^2> - <I>^2 is nothing else but the variance of the current (that's why for a square pulse, both are equal: the current doesn't change and has variance 0 during the time it flows).
So with <I> alone, you can only estimate a lower bound on the dissipated energy and all variation will increase it.
 
Well... I do not know the exact form of the wave, but I am assuming its sinusoidal in shape (but on the positive part of the wave). Now can I actually use the RMS for current when its a pulse and not an alternating current?

Also I am not so sure about using P=R*I^2 as if I use a super conductor does this equation still apply?

My goal here is I have a rough idea of the shape of this pulse I need, but I am trying to get a ball park figure for how much energy a pulse generater would have to use to generate such pulses on a continuous basis.

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K