Calculating Power Requirements for Blending Granular Materials in a Machine
- Thread starter wermix
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Power
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around calculating the power requirements for a machine designed to blend granular materials, specifically electronic waste. Participants explore various aspects of the machine's design, material properties, and blending techniques.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant seeks assistance in calculating the engine power needed for blending electronic waste, specifying a capacity of 600-700 dm3 and a density of approximately 500 kg/m3.
- Another participant questions the nature of the machine, suggesting it resembles a shredder rather than a blender, prompting clarification that it is intended to homogenize the material.
- Concerns are raised about the potential damage to electronic components during blending and the release of harmful chemicals from certain materials.
- Participants discuss the need for a gentle mixing method, suggesting alternatives like a cement mixer instead of a paddle-based blender.
- Clarifications are made regarding the size and type of materials being blended, with one participant stating that the components are crushed to about 50 mm in size.
- There is a mention of the "Brazil nut" effect, suggesting that the blending process may lead to segregation rather than homogenization.
- Some participants express uncertainty about the appropriateness of the paddle blender for the intended purpose, with suggestions for alternative methods being discussed.
- One participant emphasizes the importance of ensuring that every part has an equal chance of being included in the sample for laboratory analysis.
- There is a discussion about the difficulty of calculating power requirements, with some participants suggesting that existing equipment designs should be utilized instead of attempting to calculate from first principles.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for blending the materials or the appropriate power calculations. Multiple competing views on the machine design and blending techniques remain present throughout the discussion.
Contextual Notes
Participants express limitations in the description of the application, which complicates the ability to provide accurate suggestions. There are unresolved questions regarding the specific requirements for blending and the characteristics of the materials involved.
- 69,480
- 25,008
For us to be of any help, we will need lots more information. How big is this machine? What exactly is the material being blended? How much material at a time is put into the machine? Do other similar machines exist, and if so, what size electric motor do they use?
- 21
- 0
Attachments
- 69,480
- 25,008
So this is a shredder, not a blender?wermix said:the material will be trash of electric components
- 21
- 0
- 69,480
- 25,008
wermix said:nono :) it will be like homogenizator :)
Those two statements make no sense in juxtaposition, IMO. What the heck are you trying to make?wermix said:the material will be trash of electric components

- 21
- 0
- 21
- 0
- 781
- 529
1. Does this capacity of 40dm3 mean 40 cubic decimeters?wermix said:capacity about 40dm3 and engine power is 0.18kw
2. Is this the amount of material than fits into the mixing/processing chamber? Or is this the volume of material that can be processed within a set period of time (i.e. - 40 dm3/hour)?
- 21
- 0
- 21
- 0
- 781
- 529
More detail, please. As you may imagine, it takes considerably more power to chew through a scrapped 10 HP induction motor than it does to process a batch of circuit boards.wermix said:material will be trash of electric components
- 21
- 0
- 21
- 0
- 69,480
- 25,008
wermix said:i need to make mashine what will make sample of trash to know what type of pieces i have in
If you mash up electronics circuit boards, you will destroy the components. Is that you want? Also, some components release chemicals when smashed up (like electrolytic capacitors), and those chemicals can cause other problems. What is your end goal with this "blender"?wermix said:so i need to blend trash :O to homogenize it :) and the take it out that is why i want to use paddles :)
- 21
- 0
ok it is just blender :) it is filled with trash after milling :) so i don't care about types of components :) i just need to blend mass of electric components trash (like rubber, elektric circuits, metal fragments) this trash have pieces of size about 50mm :)- 69,480
- 25,008
For what purpose? Usually you would want to separate things for recycling, not "blend" them all up.wermix said:i just need to blend mass of electric components trash (like rubber, elektric circuits, metal fragments)
- 21
- 0
- 21
- 0
- 69,480
- 25,008
- 21
- 0
- 21
- 0
- 69,480
- 25,008
If all you want to do is mix up some stuff to make the mix more homogeneous, then look at alternative mixing technologies that are gentler on the materials, but still do a good job of mixing things together. Consider renting something like a standard cement mixer or similar apparatus instead of using a mechanism with blades...
https://www.zoro.com/marshalltown-c...MI-seEgb-K2wIV1TaBCh05_wAMEAQYAyABEgKG6vD_BwE
Attachments
- 21
- 0
... about machine this machine have 4padles .. and 6holes to take material out
- 69,480
- 25,008
- 21
- 0
- 21
- 0
- 23,867
- 11,317
Is there a particular reason why it needs to be that style?wermix said:
- 781
- 529
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granular_convection
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granular_convection
- 21
- 0
you are right :) almost :) but true is i don't need to segregate components i just need to make sure every part have same chance to be in sample :) and sample is going ot laboratory ...Asymptotic said:If I'm understanding your application correctly, the 'electric trash' is already 50 mm3 or smaller in size, and the paddle-based blender is to assure a homogeneous size distribution of trash particles. You may wish to re-examine this premise, because you are more likely to segregate the component particles to an even greater degree via the 'Brazil nut' effect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granular_convection
Similar threads
- · Replies 12 ·
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 3 ·
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 1K
- · Replies 12 ·
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 4K
- · Replies 12 ·
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 7 ·
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 998
- · Replies 14 ·
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 2K