Calculating Power Requirements for Blending Granular Materials in a Machine

  • Thread starter Thread starter wermix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the power requirements for a paddle blender designed to homogenize a mixture of shredded electronic waste, specifically targeting a capacity of 300 kg per batch. The user references a similar machine used for blending coal ash, which operates with a 0.18 kW motor for a 40 dm³ capacity. Key considerations include the density of the material at approximately 500 kg/m³ and the need for a gentle mixing process to avoid damaging components. Recommendations include using existing equipment like a cement mixer for efficiency and practicality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of paddle blender mechanics and operation
  • Knowledge of material density and its impact on mixing
  • Familiarity with power calculations for electric motors
  • Experience with equipment selection for specific applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research power calculation methods for paddle blenders
  • Explore the specifications and performance of cement mixers for blending applications
  • Investigate the effects of material density on mixing efficiency
  • Learn about the Brazil nut effect in granular materials and its implications for mixing
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mechanical engineers, equipment designers, and anyone involved in the recycling or processing of electronic waste, particularly those looking to optimize blending processes.

  • #31
russ_watters said:
Is there a particular reason why it needs to be that style?
this style isn't necessary but i don't have about any other style :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
wermix said:
you are right :) almost :) but true is i don't need to segregate components i just need to make sure every part have same chance to be in sample :) and sample is going ot laboratory ...
Then a paddle blender is perhaps not a good choice.
 
  • #33
Asymptotic said:
Then a paddle blender is perhaps not a good choice.
any better idea ? :))
 
  • #34
wermix said:
any better idea ? :))
I'd go with @russ_watters cement mixer and see how that works out.
Edit: That is, @berkeman 's
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #35
so no idea how to calculate it :D
 
  • #36
wermix said:
so no idea how to calculate it :D
Such things don't get calculated by users or even plant engineers because equipment manufactuers have been refining the designs of appropriate equipment for many years (in this case, millenia). What you do is select an already existing product to use. Here's one that fits your requirements:
http://www.performancetoolcenter.co...Bt94ay_u3c2W_uoBwkAoFOIu3o2XkZCEaAjeaEALw_wcB

The volume is almost exactly what you asked for. Note, the density of your stuff is much smaller, so the 8hp/6kW motor is more than you need.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Asymptotic
  • #37
wermix said:
we have same machine but for blending coal ash and it have capacity about 40dm3 and engine power is 0.18kw
If I needed to find out how much power was necessary, my approach would be to place a weighed sample of the trash in the existing coal ash blender, and measure power usage. Provided both the existing and (proposed, larger) blenders operate at the same paddle speed, power may scale reasonably well with mass. Keep in mind to add a safety factor for the increase in surface area, and accompanying increase in frictional losses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
785
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
530
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
598
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K