Calculating Projectile Height Using Law of Gravitation

  • Thread starter Thread starter majormaaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation Law
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
6 replies · 4K views
majormaaz
Messages
61
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


At the Earth's surface a projectile is launched straight up at a speed of 8.1 km/s. To what height will it rise? Ignore air resistance and the rotation of the Earth.

Homework Equations


F = GMm/r2
Ug = -GM/r2
G = 6.67 e -11 whatever units it happens to be
That's all I'm 'given' for this problem.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I figured that the kinetic energy that the rocket/thing starts off with converts into gravitational energy.
1/2 mv2 = GM/x2
where x is the distance between the centers of the rocket and the earth.
So that would mean x = r + h?
So if we rearrange terms to solve for x, we get:
x = ±2GM/v2 - r
However, that doesn't seem to work, either sign for the potential energy.
Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your initial equation should be

½v2= GM/x


But in any event, you did the rearranging correctly. Why doesn't it work?
 
majormaaz said:
1/2 mv2 = GM/x2
That's not right, but you seem to have (almost) used the correct version below.
where x is the distance between the centers of the rocket and the earth.
So that would mean x = r + h?
So if we rearrange terms to solve for x, we get:
x = ±2GM/v2 - r
Looks like you originally had x2, but when you corrected it you forgot to get rid of the ±. And you've left out the PE it started with.
 
1/2 mv2 = GM/x2
That's not right, but you seem to have (almost) used the correct version below.
Terribly sorry about that. I used the formula U = -GMm/x for that, where x still is what I defined it to be previously.

And you've left out the PE it started with.
So you're saying that the equation looks like:
1/2 mv2 + GMm/r = GMm/x ...? where r is the radius of the earth?
Let me try this out... looks promising.
But here's another question.

A long long time ago I learned that there was kinetic energy and potential energy, mgΔh. This type of potential energy is gravitational and so is GMm/r, so would the problem also be solved by replacing GMm/r with mgΔh?
 
majormaaz said:
A long long time ago I learned that there was kinetic energy and potential energy, mgΔh. This type of potential energy is gravitational and so is GMm/r, so would the problem also be solved by replacing GMm/r with mgΔh?
No, that's only valid for constant g.
 
haruspex said:
No, that's only valid for constant g.
aahhh... makes sense. It's similar to the reason why we don't use kinematics for equations with velocities accelerating at increasing/decreasing rates.